This is the miniseries that exists because of support from Steemians!
This is part 5, about necessary and sufficient conditions in arguments
- Part 1 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/ccxxnydh
- Part 2 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/bhqbdz74
- Part 3 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/zedqsq2u
- Part 4 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/56o28681
If you have suggestions for future miniseries, let me know in a reply!
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
Hi @davidpakman please upvote my pos at @badribireuen, so thanks....
science is developing by this way dtube is developing day by day......
thanks for the valuable post
Great work sir, Cant agree any less.
important something like this might help a lot
How I remember it:
A is necessary for B:
The falsity of A guarantees the falsity of B.
A is sufficient for B:
The truth of A guarantees the truth of B.
A is necessary and sufficient for B:
B is logically equivalent to A.
A is neither necessary nor sufficient for B:
B cannot be determined from A.