Even though you are right, you have to consider that people will upvote trending posts more than anything else because their rewards are greater, so I can ask you, do you think it is right that I upvote a trending post because my curation reward will be bigger? I always upvote my own posts, do you know why? Because after HF19 people are voting less, I have had posts up for an hour without getting a single vote, and apart from feeling bad about not making anything on a post it is kind of embarrassing and also bad publicity because people see a one hour post with 0 votes they will tend to think the content as well as the author is bad. Now if some of the people with higher voting power actually read the non voted posts and up voted according to what they like maybe self upvoting wouldn't happen, but the trending posts are where these high value votes go, regardless of quality. Of course quality is subjective, but I have seen a generic youtube video trending because the poster was one of those who always trends. I think I made this reply too long but I hope you get my point.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think higher curation rewards for trending posts is extremely dangerous to Steemit. It is how the rewards are presently concentrated in a tiny handful of accounts, and potentiates collusion and financial manipulation, rather than any curative purpose.
I have repeatedly asked witnesses and popular authors for explanations of various aspects of Steemit that seem to be designed to potentiate financial manipulation, and rarely even receive responses, and those I do generally are simply brush offs.
That being said, the cure is not to deprive yourself of your main ability to grow your network by self voting in short sighted desperation, but to post what is your interest, comment relevantly on others posts, and spread your votes to generate encouragement and attract followers - who have far more votes than you, and are naturally inclined to reciprocate.
Any business requires strategy to succeed. Steemit posting businesses are no different. I do not seek to use Steemit as a business, but find it to be a wonderful, practically troll-free site, and where I can interact with people whose minds and characters I admire.
So, my business advice is worth exactly what you paid for it =p
Edit: fiixng tyops
I get your point, and I am now trying to upvote with the little power I have as many low voted posts that I consider good as I can, but I have also noted that on most posts that I comment I don't even get a reply from the OP, I mean I am letting hin know I read his post, he should at least reply or upvote my comment, it doesn't matter if he upvotes with 0.01% of VP, but it's always good to let your readers know you are aware of them.
One thing you should probably know, is that not everyone values the same things you do. People do things we think they shouldn't, and don't do things we think they should. When we see this, it is reasonable to assume that those people's interests and ways of doing things probably aren't going to mesh well with ours.
Also, remember that a) minnows only have 10 votes to hand out a day, and your comment really needs to stand out, and b) authors with a lot of comments may not answer all comments.
If you feel an author isn't doing things right, you can mention it, or you can move on. There are certainly people that you will find aligned with your interests and ethics, and those are the people you will most bless with your comments and posts, and whose own comments and posts you will find most rewarding.
Unless you're a phat whale everyone is trying to pander to in the hope you will upvote their comment or post, you're unlikely to get everyone on Steemit to follow you, or respond to you.
Minnows can't cast 1% powered votes. They can only cast full power votes, and they only get 10 a day. If you don't feel entitled to votes, the ones you do get are pleasant support. If you feel entitled to votes, you will never be satisfied, because not everyone you feel owes you a vote will pony up.
Entitlement is your enemy, not users that can't cast a vote everywhere they want to.
Ok, I see what you mean on the other hand I got this comment on one post of mine that was referring to something along the lines of this post:
"I upvote my own work as an affirmation to myself that what I've spent time and energy bringing to birth, is worthy of at least my own recognition. If others enjoy and upvote it, that's a bonus."
So you see that is another point of view and I find it very interesting.
Well, regardless of the philosophical value of the view, it is a practice that deprives one of a vote that could be used to grow one's network. Unless you have enough SP to have a slider, you only get 10 votes a day before you have to let them recharge, so you get 10 the next day.
So, you can cast votes for yourself, and enjoy your $.02, or cast votes for others, and gain their gratitude and attention. Which is going to best improve your Steemit success?
Why are they voting less? Because they have no slider to use 25% instead of 100%? Or because now they are too busy voting for their own comments? hehe
People upvoting for curation rewards, i.e. trending posts, was part of my point on the focus for money first that drive behavior. The mindset of people can change. ;) Thanks for the feedback.
Well I asked and one of the answers was the 100% slide rule, only 10 votes a day and then a long time to refill, maybe that can be fixed?
Do you have the slider? Set it to 25% and you can get the old 40 votes per day. Or set it to 5% and you get 200 per day :P
Oh, I can do that only thing is my vote value is too low, so I have it at 20% for comments so I give at least a couple of cents.