The problem I have with the whole good and evil thing is that what is good for one may be bad for another.
Kind of a live and let live type of guy for the most part.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The problem I have with the whole good and evil thing is that what is good for one may be bad for another.
Kind of a live and let live type of guy for the most part.
What you speak of, I would call good and bad, or more specifically good for you or bad for you.
I know it may seem like a semantic difference, but Evil is always destructive.
The terms good and evil have been mixed up with good and bad.
Evil today is just a handy term for describing someone who you think is bad, with added emphasis.
But, evil is a real thing. And this current watering down of the term is what people who are practising evil have been trying to do.
One thing you all would consider evil would be these child sex trafficking rings.
What paedos are doing is evil. I would consider this a small evil compared to the world-wide human destructive plans that are going about today.
Take for instance the UN's description of human rights, which include the provision that they may be revoked. That is plain evil written to sound all nice, except for that one gotcha.