Ok, ok.
While I seem to agree with you about the quantum eraser stuff, that doesn't mean everything we currently know goes straight out the window.
You need to identify mechanisms that are BETTER at PREDICTING FUTURE STATES than the current, established theories.
Sure, abstractly, "science is wrong (imperfect)", but that doesn't mean we should revert to pure intuition.
the electric universe model is far better than the gravity model.
And, although the planets still go around the sun, all the reasons why are different, making all the assumptions they teach you today worthless.
The animistic model of the universe is far better than the materialist model
at describing... everything.
And thus, it complete obsoletes so much scientific dogma.
Further, thinking that there is a real world out there makes you assume certain things, like what i see is what you see.
When we discard that piece, we have to take into account many other aspects, like the people's feelings about such.
As for instance, these people who found cold-fusion found something.
But then, MIT came out and said it was all bogus.
Thus, the people all believed that it didn't exist.
And now it doesn't.