You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A solution to inappropriate flagging? ( ones based entirely on ideological differences....)

in #blog6 years ago

It isn't effective in combating big players from a serious down voting attack.
(check out @mepatriot as an example).
This system is playing their game. It can destroy accounts.
This circumvents this dynamic.

I'm not criticisizing freezepeac in the slightest. ( but 'we' are playing a game with rules designed to favor those with massive sp's)

I'm thinking of ways to mitigate vindictive down voting to the point that it is no longer viable as a way to destroy users earnings.
....the victims account still grows with direct steem going into their account..

This may act as a disincentive to personal vindictive attacks... Peoples accounts will still grow.

Sort:  

As of now, the “victims” have the following options:

  1. Silent curator
  2. Silent vote seller
  3. Delegate to bid bots
  4. Profits from dapps/other operations —> rare to nonexistent

Of course, like you mentioned in another comment, it’s case by case. Some people would think they qualify, but the irony is lost on them.

It is quite apparent when their is some ideological victimization going on..( from what i've seen).