Absolutely I agree to that, but what I can't agree with is a premise that
- The Rothschilds wield enormous power that can raise or raze a country
- And they're Pro-Israel.[their changed to they're thanks to @stegep99 who is a grammar na..... something or other]
yet somehow can't manage to give the Israelis a country without their enemies occupying the middle of the country.
Either 1 or 2 is true I have no problem with 1 but I find 2 laughable, if this global conspiracy that controls the finances of the world were really pro-israel their enemies wouldn't have received so much financial support, and I'm not talking about zakat but support(more money than the Marshall Plan) from the financial powerhouses like the USA.
Next thing your going to tell me is that George Soros is part of the Black power movement and their plan to take over the world because he gave money to BLM.
Bankers are nobody's friends whatever their ethnicity. So why call it Zionism? If these people were really Zionists Israel would be free,
From the Jordan to the Sea.
Well, I din't name busses either, but it's the word folks use.
Not me. I reckon he's using BLM just as zionists are using Israel--as a goad to drive their victims into the defensive corrals they want them in.
Israel is being used as exactly that, in a Hegelian Dialectic manouver to continually grant more power to the financially connected, as is the USA. Zionism is essentially a pretty racist and segregationist force, yet one of it's primary weapons has been multiculturalism, which is destabilizing Europe and the US.
Both carcasses can be picked over and their people enslaved if they collapse, and the carcass pickers I reckon are the zionists. Zion, for them, isn't really a mountain in Palestine, but world domination, IMHO.
Which is a good reason to name them properly, Globalist Bankers, and who do they work for?
No matter what you call them, they are most decidedly in it for themselves.
And no one else.
Too True!