deleted

j85063 (69) 5 years ago

Try to make us broken so we can be manipulated.

logiczombie (66) 5 years ago

It appears obvious that the end goal is to fragment us not only from the community, but in our own minds. The contradictory assertions being made daily, tinted with as much controversy as can be opined in the sharing is now the norm.

It's 1984 all over again.

WORKERS UNITE AGAINST YOUR OPPRESSORS!

The poor are not the enemy, they are a glimpse into YOUR OWN FUTURE.

Your irrational optimism will not save you.

What is done to them will be done to you.

https://thetvtraveler.com/visiting-the-georgia-guidestones/

practicalthought (67) 5 years ago

It's 1984 all over again.

The more history I've read the last few decades has me leaning towards it was always 1984, they were just more discreet in their doings. If that's the case, I have to wonder of two things.

The implications not only of their openness in rubbing our faces in it.
The fact so many can't seem to put their finger on it while they rub our faces in it.

There is a quickening to it all that doesn't suggest anything good. And based on the many different assertions at reducing world population, it seems to me that being spared to be poor might be optimistic if their rubbing our faces in the idea they plan to get rid of most of us.

https://technocracy.news/globalists-openly-admitting-to-population-control-agenda/

http://thetruthwins.com/archives/30-population-control-quotes-that-show-that-the-elite-truly-believe-that-humans-are-a-plague-upon-the-earth

So many in power that have been talking of this for a long time. I'm unsure if forced depopulation is their real goal, or if they are aware of a coming event that we are crucial for though. While the focus has been on global warming, there is some science to suggest it is more likely a naturally occurring ice age that cycles. I sometimes wonder if we are meant to be food and that's why they introduced all this tech to explode the population they now claim is a problem. They created the very problem they talk of, which adds questions of why, to what end.

logiczombie (66) 5 years ago

From your link - https://technocracy.news/globalists-openly-admitting-to-population-control-agenda/

The elites had found a new scientific front for their eugenics obsession: Climate science. In the early 1990’s the Club Of Rome published a book called ‘The First Global Revolution’. In it they state:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.

Yeah, and with AI and robots, they'll need a lot fewer peasants like us.

logiczombie (66) 5 years ago

it seems to me that being spared to be poor might be optimistic

No kidding.

Well, as far as I can tell, if each person grows their own food and carries their own water, the planet will support between 600 million and 1 billion people max.

That means about 6 billion people are about to lose a high-stakes game of musical chairs.

https://mappinghistory.uoregon.edu/english/US/US39-01.html

practicalthought (67) 5 years ago (edited)

Curious how you arrived at those numbers. So many variables that play into it. Bad crop years, fending off neighboring people for your supplies. Access to water etc.

Speaking of water, I also wonder what role our tech pollution into the water supply might have changed long term survivability in ways that weren't an issue in times past. Out of curiosity I see (according to the chart I'm linking to) that back in the 1800's the average life expectancy was between 38-45 roughly. About half what they claim it is now.

logiczombie (66) 5 years ago

Curious how you arrived at those numbers.

Look at some long-term global population charts. World population has been generally flat until about the 1890's when it starts to go parabolic.

I believe average life-expectancy is a bit of a red-herring.

Yes, "medical science" and a "safe" (non-physical) working environments can keep you alive longer, but only after you pay the price they demand.

And I'm not sure how many "retirement homes" you've visited lately, but I'm not sure it's the paradise those people were hoping for (especially now).

logiczombie (66) 5 years ago

They created the very problem they talk of, which adds questions of why, to what end.

So they can cherry-pick recruits from a larger pool of competitors before they abandon the rest of us on poisoned-trash-planet.

4 minutes,