You're right, it's not a balanced article on the topic. It's my opinion, and an attempt to explain how it feels when you understand Blurt. I never claimed it was anything else.
Not sure what you meant by double and triple posters.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I mean posters who post on Hive and then duplicate the same stuff on Steem and on Blurt, to maximize their profit. If you count only the Blurt-only stuff, then there is not too much high-quality content and good interactions left.
Or maybe I missed it (I admit I didn´t screen extensively for it).
Can you maybe point me to some good content there? Just a few examples would do.
Does your measure of good content only consider that which is not posted anywhere else? I don't think something has to be exclusive (and not posted elsewhere) to be quality. You're right that many people share their material as far and wide as they're able to, include to Blurt. I don't think that makes it bad content.
No, not at all. But it is a good way to compare the 3 platforms. Where is the best/most platform-specific content? And here, I think you would agree, is Hive by far the no. 1.
I don't think "platform-specific content" has any bearing on quality. And no, Hive is not #1, that would go to Steem by a longshot. I don't really know what your point is.
Anyway, everybody should be where he wants to. Indeed no point of arguing.
Thanks.