this incapacity to grasp that such earthen reality is potential underlies your inability to perceive, or even conceive, that such inquisition of particulars as has informed my perspective is possible.
This is the most laughable attempt to make an acid-trip sound philosophical that I've ever seen. "Inquisition of particulars?" You've never "inquired" about a single thing. You unquestioningly believe whatever is put forth by your own echo-chamber, and when confronted with first-hand testimony that refutes it you ignore it. Fact. In the entire sad history that I have spent wasting my time attempting to educate you, you have routinely asserted that your "knowledge" gained from conspiracy theorist websites was more accurate than my own first-hand experience (and that of some 13 million others." I've encountered people who believe what they're told to believe rather than what they see, but you're the first who has tried to parade that tendency as some form of profundity.
You do make an amusing patsy though. Every time I want to show how ignorant the average Conspiracy theorist is, all I have to do is screen cap a conversation where you've tried to argue with an eyewitness to genocide saying you know better than they do what is happening in their own country and that the genocide they speak of is not happening. You remind me of a MAS*H episode where Radar O'Reilly calls in to I-Corps to report the 4077th is being shelled and an officer who clearly has never worn BDU's in his life puts down his cup of tea and says "impossible. My latest intelligence report says there are no enemy units in your area. You are not being shelled, young man." And the best part is that while doing this, you unabashedly and unashamedly accuse me of "cognitive dissonance." Borrow a dictionary from someone who lives in a state where books aren't outlawed and look up what that phrase means, and then reflect on your own tendency that I just described (provided self-reflection is even within your capabilities).
I used to spend a lot of time responding to your posts and trying to show, from my own eyewitness accounts, that what you've been told to believe is in fact false. When it got to the point that your own blog was openly and unabashedly echoing demonstrable falsehoods that originated from the same monsters who are responsible for the murder of 174 of my students, that's when it clicked: "this guy's not just uninformed. He knows what is being done by the Russians he cheerleads for and he supports it."
Oh and I didn't "characterize" you as a God-damned thing. You're a Stalinist. Period. Your blog is a montage of Stalinic talking points, from the "Nazis in Ukraine" myth he invented in 1939 to the "Russia must save the world from Western Decadence" refrain that he used to keep morale up in the bread-lines, to your laughable audacity in putting "I think kindness is overrated" into your signature line while you habitually cheer for the ongoing genocide of Ukrainians and frame the Ukrainians themselves as "warmongers" for daring to fight back, and then rave for days when your government dares extend a helping hand to refugees who have faced ACTUAL hardship (a concept that a parlor-raised pipsqueak such as yourself can scarcely fathom).
You hate truth. But what's more damning is that you are a knowing, willful and frequent cheerleader for mass murder.