Well the paper I was reading did just that and it is not the first time it has been done.
Posted using Partiko iOS
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well the paper I was reading did just that and it is not the first time it has been done.
Posted using Partiko iOS
I know, but one has land ice and sea ice and the other is just sea ice. It means that unless you compare the sea ice and state that is increasing in the south compared to the decrease in the north then the comparison. imho is not that valid
The thing is that one of the poles is losing much much much more than what the other pole is gaining additionally.