No doubt @aggroed is setting the bar high for anybody that competes with him.
Much better than the last guy that fancied himself in charge,...
Now if we could get him to stop accepting money for votes and circle jerking all them folks he would be near perfect.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
accepting money for votes?
circle jerking?
I delegate out around 100k steem for free to projects like teh @minnowsupport for new users to use for free or msp-curation, which is a manual curation project I fund.
My voting patterns are pretty good with over 100 people voted over the last month and no one person receiving a vast majority...
I think you have me confused somehow.
I know characterizing the facts in the manner i have is likely to evoke an emotional response, but that doesn't change the facts.
What you do with the money may be admirable but it is a tax on the commons taken by virtue of your stake.
This is the game we are all playing.
If we play this game by the old rules the results will be no better than under the old rules.
Better that you let the manual curators decide the value of posts than you sell rewards to the highest bidder, imo.
I think consensus supports proof of brain over proof of wallet.
Selling votes, and supporting supporters over nonsupporters, breaks proof of brain.
So, while you continue doing those things, i dont have you confused.
For the extrapolaters, i see steem working like drugwars did to reverse this funnel and start rewarding folks that do the work over those that eat without working.