- Do you know where witness stand on that issue?
- Don't you think it would be quite important to add this feature as quickly as possible?
- Are Steemians supposed to trust that this feature will be added in the future when it will become harder to be voted in?
- Shouldn't a chart of where witness stand on that issue be compiled?
- I don't know for most witness and I don't know any easy way to verify.
- Yes.
- No, if this feature is not worked on now, this is a concerning thing.
- Yes.
You are not entitled to a personal response every time you bidbot up a rant.
I've never said I'm entitled to some answer. I didn't even ask for an answer. My post has no question.
You expressed being disconcerted over not getting responses quickly. You shouldn't be.
I will comment that gradual decay is unimplementable in practice as far as I know. No one has proposed a method to implement it practically and the only method I can think of would be enormously complicated (the latter being a property of things that are a very, very bad idea to code into a consensus system).
Simple expiration is feasible and I am in favor of it. I would base it on the account being completely inactive for some period, indicating possible loss of key.
Maybe you're right! I'm not perfect. Far from it.
Same here! Also inactivity in regard to active key.
Yes active or owner key should should demonstrate some usage otherwise it may be impossible to change witness votes and they should eventually expire.