It seems you do not grasp the network effect, and how distribution creates markets, which in turn creates capital gains. It is the concentration of stake in but a few accounts now which is preventing the price of Steem from rising to reflect it's actual value as a token, and the failure of distribution to increase the stake of new accounts that deprecates Steem social media to the point that user retention is a miserable 7.5% YOY.
Growing the society using Steem is the best way to increase the price of Steem, and the FAANGs have proved that social media is the most profitable business model extant. It is taking enormous profiteering pressure to suppress the value of Steem and it's social media business model. Whales are currently extracting ~90% of the rewards, and EIP is about to more than double their share of the remaining ~10% - plus whatever the downvote pool allows them to take another run at after they flag the rewards back to the pool.
Nothing would be better for the price of Steem than vastly improved distribution. As has been pointed out even if Stinc delegated out all of it's stake to minnows, and they sold every bit of rewards they earned with that delegation, it wouldn't equal the sales from one whale right now. You must not realize the degree to which stake is concentrated on Steem, because you aren't seeing how negatively that centralizes what is touted as a decentralized platform.