These photos were taken from a variety of sources, without re-upload. Robot trials for plagiarism. How people would comment on my posting this.
I try to share as others also share like this.
These photos were taken from a variety of sources, without re-upload. Robot trials for plagiarism. How people would comment on my posting this.
I try to share as others also share like this.
Evidently, it is very easy to submit in STEEMIT. I didn't get it, before.
Before, I thought, the original author is someone else ... Someone who works with great effort to produce his own work. I am truly a fool! 😴
I don't much like the "Look what I found on the interwebs" posts, I greatly prefer original content, but people should post what they want to, voting can do the rest. For something like this, however, I think the pictures should be attributed to a person, if at all possible, and not be posted under the "photography" tag. This post as it is would be borderline flaggable to me.
This an example, why should we bother with creating quality content in exchange for compensation. It's just a standard test post.
Everything depends on the conscience, and our ethics in creating post
yep, and we will get rewards from works of someone who has been kind enough to share it on the interwebs, no matter who he was. People will applaud and praise the greatness of us, while we sometimes just put a picture link, not even a website. How we are just a mere exploiter!