Forgive me everyone, but I’m knackered. I’m going to take the morning off, slide my aching body into a bath with the book my sister loaned me ages ago and get lost in one of Liane Moriarty’s finest. However, my worse half Tim Foley has requested he take this opportunity to say some things that have been rattling around in that world-class brain of his.
~ Caitlin
Hey.This is Tim Foley, Caitlin's husband, soulmate, collaborator, and the voice with the American accent in her podcast. As Caitlin has said many times, I help her with her work a lot and am involved in most of the things she publishes to some extent. In my more arrogant moments I secretly think of myself as the Kathleen Brennan to her Tom Waits. We do everything together.
So, while I am admittedly extremely biased, I also happen to be the world's foremost authority on Caitlin Johnstone among individuals not named Caitlin Johnstone. Since some profoundly depraved characters have been viciously hounding my beloved in a way she hasn't quite figured out how to deal with just yet, I would therefore like to lend my voice to making it clear what Caitlin is, and what she is not, from the perspective of someone who knows her infinitely better than her detractors.
Here are some things I would like to say:
1. Caitlin is not a Nazi.
Come the fuck on. Troll harder.
2. Caitlin is not a Nazi apologist, a racist, a fascist, a white supremacist, or a "Strasserist".
Nobody who reads Caitlin's work actually believes that she is any of these things. The only people who claim that she is any of the above are the people who desperately want potential readers to think horrible things about her for reasons which have nothing to do with those allegations. Caitlin's deep compassion toward all disadvantaged groups is evident in her writing.
The only reason her haters dust off obscure labels like "Strasserist" to pin on her is because they know they look ridiculous straight up calling her a Nazi. The label hasn't been Godwin's Lawed to death so most folks are unaware that it's just a fancier, more erudite-looking way of calling someone a Nazi. It is absurd.
I met Caitlin on Facebook, long before she got involved in this writing gig and long before I took a permanent trip to the land of strange marsupials and bad Mexican food to be with her forever. During that time she was frequently posting about Aboriginal rights, the mistreatment of refugees on Manus Island, white privilege, and police brutality in America.
It hurts her when people call her racist because it goes against every fiber of who she is as a person. It works as a bullying tactic specifically because it is not true.
3. Caitlin is the most deeply, pervasively good human being that I have ever met.
I spent a significant portion of my early adult life seeking out extraordinary people to teach me how to be a good and holy man, and living in the San Francisco Bay Area there was never any shortage of teachers and gurus being funneled through the satsang circuit to meet. This overlapping interest in spiritual development was how I met Caitlin in a Facebook group years ago, and in spite all of the frenetic guru-hopping I did in America, I have never met anyone like her.
Everything in her is pointed at health and good will. Acting in what she calls "the highest interest" is her singular guiding principle in life. She's never hesitant to loudly put someone in their place when they are acting in a malignant way (including me), but if you spend time in her physical presence you get the distinct sense that there isn't actually anything hard or angry in her at all. She radiates health and is always working toward the greater good. Being around her feels like being with someone who made of pure heaven. I don't know how else to describe it.
Her life reflects her pervasive goodness. Watching the grace with which she raises her two wonderful children is awe inspiring, and the complete absence of fixed patterns in her mental behavior allows for the most amazing surprises to come toward us every day. I won't get into all the miracles I've seen this woman work because they're so extraordinary it would take on a life of its own, but I don't believe anything like her exists in this world and I am unspeakably grateful to be able to spend my life with her.
4. Caitlin is not paid by the alt-right, the Kremlin, WikiLeaks, Assad, Iranian Mullahs, Soros, or any of the other bizarre conspiracy theories I've seen around.
The only thing dumber than the "Caitlin is a secret Nazi" conspiracy theories are the "Caitlin is a paid agent of X shadowy group" conspiracy theories. Ordinary people send her money via Patreon, Paypal and book sales because they like what she writes, and her audience grew as rapidly as it did for the same reason.
There are a lot of no-talent, boring wannabes on the leftist political commentary circuit, and I can understand how tempting it would be for these losers to want to spread these rumors after watching her zip past them with ease, but it's pure bullshit. You don't get people interested by always making sure you share the consensus opinions of the academic elite in your particular sect of leftism and writing a low-energy article about it every few weeks (see virtually everything in CounterPunch if you want examples), you do it by creating high-quality, insightful and interesting content every single day. If you happen to have a smart, sexy husband to assist you with your work, that helps too.
5. The "Caitlin doesn't understand US politics because she's not from here" smear is inherently illegitimate.
Hi, hello, Caitlin's collaborator here, and I'm as American as mass shootings. I co-sign everything Caitlin writes. You can claim we're wrong, but you can't legitimately claim that we're not informed by an American perspective.
6. Caitlin has never spoken with Mike Cernovich.
Her haters talk about her like they're buddies or something, but the two have never corresponded to any extent. She's flagged his attention a few times when there's some information she wants seeded throughout the MAGA community, and he retweets her frequently, but that's the extent of their relationship. She is however friendly with Cassandra Fairbanks of "Find Dancing Man" fame, who (like Cernovich) is incorrectly labeled alt-right by numbskulls who are too far into their echo chambers to understand the difference between a garden variety Trump supporter and a white ethnonationalist like Richard Spencer (whom Caitlin has explicitly denounced). If you're going to smear her for being chummy with a Trump-supporting internet celebrity, at least get it right.
7. Caitlin still maintains that the left and the right should collaborate in issues where their interests converge.
And she's right. Everyone's still shitting themselves because nine months ago Caitlin cited Mike Cernovich as someone that she personally wouldn't mind working with on some specific issues, which her haters falsely twisted into "Caitlin wants the left to work with Mike Cernovich", which they then falsely twisted into "Caitlin wants the left to work with the alt-right", which they then falsely twisted into "Caitlin is a Nazi/racist/fascist/Strasserist", but he was just an example and she explicitly said different people will have different degrees of comfort with whom they can work with on specific issues.
To this day Caitlin's only collaboration with Cernovich consists of him sometimes retweeting her anti-interventionist arguments (including her opposition to interventionism in Iran), but there are many other conservatives with whom she collaborates to a much greater extent, like the Ron Paul Institute which frequently republishes her articles. This is a perfect illustration of ways individuals on the left and the right can magnify one another's voices on issues of convergence against the Orwellian neoconservative warmongering centrists to whatever extent works for them.
Talking to people of differing ideologies is just being a normal adult human being. I always wonder how the people shrieking about Caitlin's pointing this out function in society. Don't they work? If so, how do they get through the day if collaborating with a conservative toward a common goal makes them a "Strasserist"? Do they refuse to go to Thanksgiving because one of their uncles voted for Trump, which makes him "alt-right" which makes you a Nazi for eating turkey near him? Their approach only makes sense inside the most warped echo chambers of an exclusively online forum.
8. The infamous interview with Cynthia McKinney and Robert David Steele was my fault.
In July of last year Caitlin's nervous system was blasted out by the relentless smears and attacks just like it is now, but to an even greater extent. I had to basically carry her through the whole ordeal with tons of support, and I got some stuff wrong. She was really messed up from all the abuse she was suffering when she received a request to make an appearance on a video chat with Robert David Steele and Cynthia McKinney, who wanted to support her against all the attacks. She asked me what I thought, and I knew she badly wanted to talk to McKinney, whom she adores, so I said go for it.
Before we knew it there she was, with Steele talking about how "the alt-right and the alt-left" need to come together, a position Caitlin never held, but in too much of a mental fog to protest. Now whenever these smears come up Caitlin's haters share a clip of the interview with Steele saying that crap with Caitlin nodding mutely along. They mock her shell-shocked appearance when they were the ones who caused it, and it guts me.
I am Caitlin's partner and collaborator; it was my job to protect her from that in her frazzled state, and I failed. I felt really bad about it. I think I do a good job of helping her most of the time, but sometimes I screw up in a way she's not able to catch and correct, and that was definitely one of them. The info she later needed to correct about Seth Rich's Reddit posts getting deleted was another one of my fuckups as well. We've both been a lot more careful since then.
9. Caitlin has never plagiarized anything from anyone.
There's someone named Nina Illingworth who we recently discovered had been telling her followers for months that Caitlin plagiarizes her writings. Neither of us knew anything about Illingworth (the name was vaguely familiar to Caitlin, I'd never even heard it), and we were both completely unfamiliar with her work. After viewing Illingworth's website and Twitter page, two things were clear to us, and will probably be clear to you too: (1) Illingworth is clearly mentally and/or emotionally disturbed, (2) she can't write for shit.
This hasn't stopped a few relatively high-profile lefties from circulating Illingworth's claims as fact. They did this not because those claims looked legitimate, but because they hate Caitlin and want to harm her reputation.
The only person Caitlin will shamelessly use the work of is me, and she does so with my permission. Her writings are born out of our ongoing daily conversations about life and politics, and I don't copy anyone either.
10. Caitlin's haters are assholes.
Okay, I guess this one's a little more opinion than fact, but whatever. Fuck Jeffrey St. Clair and Joshua Frank and their CounterPunch stooges, fuck Benjamin Dixon and his Groupthink Army, fuck the humorless twat Ben Norton and the perpetually hateful Eoin Higgins, fuck Robbie Martin and his unbelievably wanky "let me spend years making an eight-hour documentary and then hide it behind a paywall so nobody knows it exists except my sister's fancy friends" elitism, fuck Caitlin's Facebook stalker Yoav Litvin, and fuck the rest of them as well. Fuck you all for hurting the most amazing person I have ever known. I hate you.
~ Tim
Best "Top Ten" list ever! Extremely insightful and well put. These bullies hounding Caitlin are disgusting, and Twitter helping them to do it (punishing the victim, not the abusers) is downright appalling.
Amen Elizbeth!
Love Caitlin Johnstone and now love Tim Foley too. Caitlin, you are a breath of fresh air in the stale journo world and Tim, I thank you for spelling out the names of the old guard left who corner the narrative and self-pedestal themselves. As Caitlin spelled out in her recent "A Little About Me" piece, the fight for humanity is not exactly a left versus right fight anymore, the Globalist monster is churning up all...I think Caitlin, like Suzie Dawson and Elizabeth Lea Vos is a changemaker in journalism, and I would love to honor that with an interview sometime... thank you both for fearless open-hearted writing, that's what we need in the world today :)
Let me share with you some of Yoav Litvin’s research he did as a graduate student at Rockefeller University Most of it concerned putting female rats and mice in stressful situations and studying hormonal changes brought about by the stress. I can’t help but think he sees Caitlin as a human lab rat. He’s probably feverishly recording all your reactions to this harassment and bullying. Beware if he asks you to send him blood and urine samples. And I have no idea why he’s fascinated by the labias of prepubertal girls.
So does this seem rather unfair and far-fetched to make what are rather run-of-the-mill neurobehavioral studies seem creepier and more nefarious than they really are? (Although there is a case to be made for the mistreatment of so many animals for these experiments.) Probably. Is this the type of guilt-by-association crap he’s been smearing Caitlin with.? You betcha. Turn-around is fair play. ;-)
Oh my goodness. People in glass houses, Yoav!
Well, lookee here! In this article he defacto calls another female journalist, Diane Johnstone, a rat. I’m not sure he didn’t originally mistake you for her and could never admit his mistake.
Interestingly enough, his premise about rats spreading plague is wrong - it was poverty and inequality. But it seems Yoav never wants to acknowledge that as one of the factors for the rise of right wing extremism.
Oh, wow. That is interesting.
I first heard of the ridiculous Nazi charge when I used one of your posts which showed how Wikileaks was being misquoted to respond to a rabid Clinton supporter who was repeating the misquotes in comments on my blog. They then Googled your name and came back accusing me of being a Nazi since I linked to you--even though it had nothing anything remotely related to supporting Nazis, along with the whole line of attack against you sounding like nonsense.
Of course that is a demonstration of the intellectual dishonesty and McCarthyist tactics of many Clinton supporters. In other words, it is further confirmation of #10 above.
I'm gonna recycle a comment from yesterday. It's the most important comment of all; for all of us:
The Establishment is Running Scared
First they Ignore you.Then they Laugh at you.Then they Fight you.Then you win.
Appreciate hearing from you, Tim. Keep up the good work.
My GF and I are a team like this. It's good for someone close to have your back.
Caitlin many stand in solidarity with you, and appreciate your efforts to bring some sanity back to public discourse. I'm appalled at the abuse you have had to endure from some whom claim to be "progressive". You are effective & you reach ppl, that's why you are feared. #Unity
I am in love with your wife! And now I'm falling in love with you.
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.
Your wife’s a good egg.
People don’t like the floaters with opinions of their own, who say “Right and Left must come together”
Those people are deeply unpopular. I am one of those people. I haven’t chosen a camp. I mistrust politicians. It’s not like I agree with her over absolutely everything either, I don’t know that there is anyone who agrees with ME over absolutely everything, and that’s not important.
What else is there to do but come together? Get so deeply divided that we start killing each other? Because that’s what They want.
Strength to you both.
Ok, I have only just now read your article re the kimdotcom post on civil war. It makes sense. I now feel better.
It’s a treasure to find someone I didn’t expect to be the 1st one I follow while figuring out how to use Steemit, Caity’s hubby! 😀 my first post too.
A few contradictions here. She’s never met Mike Cernovich, and yet, “ she personally doesn’t mind working with on some specific issues.” I guess you could say she was working from a virtual office, but it seems a distinction without a difference. I think the problem here is the verb “working” is being asked to mean a bit too much, and more appropriate verbiage could be chosen.
Racist as a derogatory epithet should also raise flags. To the degree one respects and wants to constructively engage racially informed prejudices, it would be avoided. The term virtue signaling seems to sum it up rather well — according oneself a virtuous mantle for having the probity to attack someone else for a lack of virtue. But while defending oneself might be viewed as necessary, attacking another is not virtuous. Name calling is bad form. Yet we do it these days, with this name, seemingly too frequently and too easily. He who lives by the sword . . . I almost imagine that in one of Hillary’s focus groups, they shopped the term, and found out you get an extra five points when you call the other guy “racist”. So they leap to label that one whenever there’s the slightest opening.
Criticism by some might be jealousy; by others, a gatekeeper function — trying to keep out a new competitor; and some of it comes from the opposition, the targets in the status quo who don’t appreciate being assailed and want to neutralize the attacker. The test of Caitlan’s writing will be in whether it spurs her readers to be more functional in opposition to the politics she abhors. Will it goad them on to lead more revolutionary lives? The fruit of this kind of discipline can take years to bear. In the meantime, it is either well written, interesting, informative, entertaining — or not.
I came to Caitlin at Newslogue during the primary, when deception after deception was being meted out by Mrs. Clinton’s coterie, working hand in glove with many of the major media outlets, with outlets like CTR (now Shareblue) using unaccountable PAC funds to dilute and disturb public discourse in a way that must have made the CCP envious. Calling foul, Caitlan emerged as a true superstar, documenting the abuse of Berners, and debasement of all the sordid DCCC. (The Republicans had long ago debased themselves with an uninterrupted run from Goldwater and Nixon down to Bush.)
I read every column, and cheered on her rise. Now, the playing field seems quite similar, with Russiagate taking the place of the election, and Russia (Syria, too) as valiant as Bernie, and just as beset by malignant untruths and a cabal of deviant sycophant malingerers. This can’t go on forever though, and the dynamic of Caitlan’s place in the sturm und drang of political epiphanies must evolve. So I expect there will be changes.
While I think it’s healthy to disparage those on the left like Robbie, please don’t feel obliged to do so simply because he disparaged Caity. Your remarks about his firewalled documentary opus were right on the fucking mark. He’s struggling, I imagine, like we all are, and he doesn’t get it right 100% of the time. And if he gets catty about Caity sometimes, well, perhaps that’s a sign of intimacy rather than a sign of division. Who we’re going to “work with” seems a rather abstruse criterion for judgement, especially when “work” brings with it an explicit avowal of having never met the other party.
We've been reading Caitlin's work for a long time and now support her on Patreon. She is 100% patron supported and is definitely worth every penny she earns ... and then some. This is what Journalism is really all about. Thank you Caitlin for all your hard work. Remember, the more crap you hear from the haters means you continue to hit mark. Great stuff!