I noted that @berniesanders commented on @dwinblood's post about investigating flagging that there was no premining.
I don't agree, and wonder if denial may figure into some of the reason for that comment.
Just thought I'd mention it to you, as you may have relevant comment.
I did see that conversation, and it is largely why I find the recent denial that there was any premining to be incorrect.
I recall linking you to a source on the initial formation of Steem(it), and that included a reset which wiped out competing mining interests, while leaving that particular party's mining efforts intact.
Due to the fact that Steem became publicly traded, I reckon that's not a good and lawful position to be in, should the SEC decide to concern themselves about it.
I just want the good features of Steemit to no longer be held back by financial shenanigans. I hope you can pull it off!