To me it seems nitpicky. Now don't get me wrong, huge fan and I'm all for legalization and all the benefits it provides, I just think if different metrics were used such as something more linear the outcome wold be different.
It seems that the title is there to discuss laziness while the article shows income. But then for the same reason we can talk about cocaine. being expensive it's usually rich successful people who partake. That doesn't mean coke causes success, just that that is how some rich people like to have fun. Same for weed IMO,just a way for already successful people to relax
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
that doesn't make any sense... they assessed both smokers and non smokers and analyzed a variety of different categories using standard measurement tools, those taking part in the study also had no clue what the study was about, they were just ignorantly taking part and answering questions. There is nothing "nitpicky" about asking participants their income levels or life satisfaction, info about whether or not they volunteer etc, these are basic questions that are asked in thousands of psych studies.