Yes cause someone voted it higher since my first downvote, do you feel this is quality content that should be rewarded higher?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes cause someone voted it higher since my first downvote, do you feel this is quality content that should be rewarded higher?
I simply just don't believe in downvotes, never given one. Especially downvoting accounts that have been here as long as us. I've worked hard on this platform for years and I just don't feel it's justified. I think one less than stellar post out of hundreds is justified, but do what you will. I have always paid attention to your posts, all of which I would consider great content. You always had plenty of support so I would always choose to vote for the smaller accounts. But, you do what you will
People need to get used to downvotes and not act this way, especially older accounts. Without downvotes some will eventually haejin this place up again. You've been there and seen what occurred at the time and you know how Hive works, doesn't matter if you're a genius or super committed to Hive, if price goes up by a lot it's unrealistic to give people $10k per post while others barely get anything. So downvotes are a means of redistributing the rewards same way as voting for many with lower percentages.
I've voted your posts up quite a bit in the past so it's also kind of offensive that you take one downvote this way, doesn't mean I disagree with you posting less quality posts now and then, you just gotta be okay with some of them getting downvoted especially since we both know autovotes are what both of us get most of the time no matter the content.
I actually would agree (also with the flag), but ... did you for example also flag this one? :
https://hive.blog/hive-167922/@themarkymark/tribe-curation-apr-analysis
If not that shows the problem of HIVE: all are equal, but some are 'more' equal. :)
Wrong account but yeah.