It wasn't like they didn't give fair warning to Jones, he ran a video of a full grown man grabbing a kid by the throat and face slamming him into the ground. Some nut job watching his show goes out and does the same thing but only this time some young kids brains splat all over the place not only can his parents sue Jones but they can also sue the provider. I watched one of the other banned videos and personally how the video opened could have provoked someone radical to try and blow up the infowar studio, or even seek revenge on Utube or FB offices where innocent people could have been hurt. Further into the video I pretty much had to agree with everything he said....but it was the "shock" value of the commentary leading into the video that was concerning. The shock value was the lead in, to grab attention in a hugely competitive market, to agree to such activity is like saying what's the human cost of selling some vitamin supplements. People get sued everyday for not being directly involved in harm of other people, they provided the avenue or platform upon which the harm rendered itself from. Mandalay Bay is a perfect current example of such. How could they have possibly known especially in a business where people carry large bags in and out all day long. He basically was asked to tone down the "shock value" level, he didn't, and personally I can't blame the providers for not wanting to risk it. Overall it wasn't his content overall, he's been doing that for years, it was how he was hyping up his lead in to grab attention. There's always been limits, terms of conditions, just ask Howard Stern, the original "shock jock", he didn't like the rules so he moved somewhere that allowed him to say or do as he pleases, there are places out there that will take the risk Alex just needs to find them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How about TeleSUR?
Or the demonetization of effective lefties like Jimmy Dore?
Jones is an ugly animal, he's not cute, he's not valuable.
@caitlinjohnstone is completely correct in that controlling the narrative is key.
Are you following Q at all by any chance?
Can't understand how Q is not censored on the YT. I'm sure it's algorithmically censored, but it's not a censor on sight situation... yet.
Peace
There's a very good reason Q isn't censored, but you don't want to know it.
People need to form cliques, and are biologically rewarded for doing the dirty work of defending cliques against opposition with shots of dopamine for denying facts, telling lies, and etc...
You and I too.
Even though you will be angry at me, deny the truth of what I say, and only realize that you did so because you're an animal designed to defend your clique long after it's too late to do any good, I will tell you why Q isn't censored.
Q is a psyop by the globalists, designed to turn the global tide to their benefit, by slight nudges. Rather than just state that you should be on their team, they nudge you bit by bit until you only finally realize you are, and have long been, supporting one of their teams in the fight against freedom, and by then you will have invested so much, and burned so many bridges back, that you will just remain onboard and retain the benefits of cliquing therein.
Psygroup is doing a masterful job running Q.
Sorry.
Assume much?
You know nothing about me and my beliefs. And you have no idea why I asked that question.
This is not our first interaction on this issue, and neither of us hasn't been to the rodeo before.
Of course I assume. It's the shortcut to clarity. Like all shortcuts, it can lead you astray. Perhaps I was wrong to assume you supported Q at this time, despite your prior advocacy.
I note you didn't prove me wrong.
I am curious if you are aware of entities like Psygroup, Black Cube, etc. Many 'retired' intelligence agency personnel staff such outfits, and official government sanction of their undertakings is pretended to be washed away.
Sneaky bastages.
I have not written anything on Q except that it was a psyop.
I'm pretty sure it's a psyop. I say "pretty sure" only to distinguish it from the corporate media which I know is a psyop.
I am not familiar with Psygroup and Black Cube, but I will find out after writing this.
Because you have proved my assumption was incorrect, I take back my entire screed. I must have misrecalled, and for my error I apologize.
Thanks for setting me straight!
thanks.
I didn't know the names, but I knew the players.
I see the 2 teams tribing up: Pedophiles vs Traitors. Doesn't look like much room for negotiation to me. I have yet to see a fact confirmed from either side.
I'm not much on tribing up. I tend to wind up somewhere other than the binary answers allowed, and then they show me their ass and my ass usually escapes being hit as the door shuts on my way out.
As far as my addressing whether you were right or wrong, you essentially asked me when I stopped beating my wife.
I'm not a fan of apologists to the current system we live under and I'm also no fan of being telepathically (sp?) pigeon holed into a binary choice.
As you show, it's hard to be wrong if you admit you don't know. It's all too often the true answer, and more should know and state it.
Thanks!
TeleSur is up and running on FB, just checked, last post six hours ago. Sometimes FB pulls stuff until it gets investigated. I had that happen with something I shared that someone posted on my account. When you first see the warning it looks pretty concerning...I was like what could I have possibly posted that someone complained about. I go on there a couple times a month at the least, as I scrolled down there was a correction that said the content had been viewed and was deemed to be okay and they released the hold on it. I believe the media does try and control the narrative, there's no doubt about that. That's why it's important we have people willing to go the alternate route to get news out there....but that doesn't mean some of those people have complete free reign to provoke, suggest, or instigate violence unless a platform from which they are provided to unleash that kind of propaganda is willing to take the risk. People have been killed for less then someone opening their show with the statement that Muhammad is a pedophile, if they will attack a news organization over drawing cartoons someone on the fringe of radicalization could easily take offense at that remark he made. FB, Utube or any other news organization has to at some point ask themselves is that statement worth the risk?
The Internet is under attack .