i don't normally reference or acknowledge wikipedia because anyone can write there...
it's research suicide
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
i don't normally reference or acknowledge wikipedia because anyone can write there...
it's research suicide
Yeah more like a reference, but hey i mean the ones who control the internet can change anything so basically nothing's a good source of you think of it, books either, like the translations of the same book.
you can change wikipedia if you wanted, or some guy who just wants to fart with the service could change wikipedia which in reality renders the entire service unreliable..
as for a good source - few exist.
thanks, I for some reason just heard that name bunyan recently...can't recall where. Are you a fan of the Higherside Chats? Really interesting chat regarding the Masonic tracing board and various pathways to hyperspace was recently mentioned. Have you seen anything like that in your work?
the information i share doesn't come from published material. anytime you see some supposed secret philosophy being publicized on a media stream it's because it doesn't hold any real value.
the information i share isn't talked about and you can bet your bottom dollar the few that actually understand the few secrets that matter don't want me talking about any of it.
i am the ultimate rebel - i just dgaf