這故事已經上演千百遍了~~~ Transparency is good only when people can accept the reality.
steemit本身希望按帖文質素而給予相應獎勵的概念。
這是個錯誤的期待，套句這裡說到爛的一句話... quality is subjective.
讓我用數學方式說說：upvote of a whale is a function of {his own subjective quality on the post, other whales' upvotes, social considerations (baodatui, being unselfish, if I like the author...etc)}. So your own subjective quality doesn't matter, but the post itself (texts and images, these are objective) enter a whale's function through all three components. You need to picture how your post is regarded in the eyes of others, esp whales or whales' curators. That's a long story and long way to go.
哈哈好一個數學解釋啊
其實玩久了的人其實都明白的，根本steemit就是一個很複雜的微社區，問題只不過是新人對steemit有另一種期待
但一開始跟他們說這一堆大道理又好像好奇怪... 難搞啊
下次如果再有朋友想加入，我或許應該一早說出真實的一面，而非輕輕說一句寫好文章就有錢收，這樣至少不會有那麼大的落差吧~