Hi,
I am not sure who told you that myth but none of our comments is ever automated.
The post was translated before the comment was selected and the comment cannot be more accurate.
It exactly describes the case. Complete copypasta of content with ZERO original content added to the post. Besides full copypasta of the text from the source mentioned by the user, the user is also abusing-spamming tags by posting the content under irrelevant tag such as "gambling", as well as spamming curated "photography" tag that has no relation to this post.
It also seems that the user has been actually quite busy posting photography that isn't own under curated tags for quite a while. As example:
https://steemit.com/cn/@shimeng/3jfgyj
Seriously, you need to learn to read the comments with understanding and learn about what amounts to abuse on Steemit before writing-repeating such nonsense.
If you were complaining about about TAG abuse then that should have been what was complained about in the comment. YouTube page to has all the content it is obvious this is where this person scraped it from. Many people post YouTube links while adding ZERO additional content.
IF you are picking on this one because of TAG abuse you should have said that and I wouldn't have complained so loud, but you didn't this is why it appears the comment was at least semi-automated. BTW It still appears this way. What you think is spam is different.. spam is the comments on one of steemcleaners posts, I can't even load them. Now THAT'S spam! This is just a shit post that no-one cares about, no one reads, had a whopping 2 upvotes, isn't taking up much space on the blockchain. It seems your cure is worse then the disease you are complaining about.
@logic
The content is indeed from the YouTube page not the source linked to in the @steemcleaners comment. This can be checked because it's not even the same and it matches the YouTube page. I'm not arguing about the tag abuse but that was not in the original comment and you did not address anything that I said. Seriously?
ps. use proper quoting not screenshot images please.
Seriously. Go back and read again. Try again to understand the comment as you have evident cognitive problems.
The comment is CORRECT. It points out the COPYPASTA. Content is nothing more by copying and pasting content from the source mentioned in the post, with ZERO original thought added to it. I already EXPLAINED.
And tag abuse was not commented for as it is lesser abuse in comparison to copypasta. Copypasta abuse has priority to be commented on so it is always commented first.
Stop spamming our comments with your ignorant, oblivious comments as you have no understanding of our scope of investigations and abuse we chase. It's clear that you never read a single abuse guide that we have ever posted.
Neither the main content (the video) or the metadata for that content (the credits and lyrics) are are from the URL that @steemcleaners claims is the "source".
The content is a Karaoke VIDEO the text is the credits for that video and the lyrics. What @steemcleaners claims is the source is an MP3 upload/download site where someone (not the artist) uploaded a version. That song has different credits as well as the lyrics. I don't think insulting people pointing out these issues is the way to handing things.
It makes no difference which source we give for copypasta comments!
When it is copypasta that has many sources (such as song lyrics), we give any of these sources in our comment. Doesn't necessary be the exact one that is listed in the post.
Actually, we don't need to provide the source in copypasta comment at all, as the comment is self explanatory itself. We just do it to provide more information.