If someone commits a crime he deserves punishment and that can administered with force. You are OK with that, right
I don't agree if it was a victimless crime. I am okay with it if there was an actual victim. And if the victim is calling it a crime because the person said they called them a name or something petty like that then I am not okay with that.
Though I tend to be an advocate for people having property that belongs to them, and if I make something it can be mine. If I find out how to make something nice people like, and I save up enough to build a place that can make more of them and I voluntarily find people that agree to work for me for whatever they and I agreed to and I can make more, that does not suddenly make that belonging to the public and those people. The people can choose not to work for me. Someone else can offer them a better deal. If they voluntarily chose to work with me and agreed to the contract then that is between them and me, and is of no concern to anyone else.
I do consider COERCION as force an involuntary so if the person was coerced into working for someone that is a different story.
However, CRIME is not always a crime in my opinion. The States call a lot of things crimes that are nothing of the sort as far as I am concerned.
Of course I meant real crime like theft and murder , not breaking one of billion useless laws we have. Btw who is to determine what is crime and what is not?
To me a place where I can only get money through getting someone to employ me and if I don't have money I starve to death is something I consider "coercion". There are many jobs/talents where you can work as your own boss or start a company but there will be a lot of people who rely on the job market and sometimes feel immense pressure by it.
Oh and I found out there are people who call themselves "libertarian socialists", they say a lot of stuff that is similar to my ideas.
Yeah there are a lot of DENOMINATIONS of Libertarianism and Anarchism. :)
Exactly... which is why I put DENOMINATIONS in caps. :)
I talked about using 'Vogelfreiheit' instead of prison in the article I linked you.
nope, you just define socialism as state communism. Look at the very definition of the word "social". It just acknowledges that we live in a society.
If you want me to get rid of the word I have to disappoint you, we Germans just associate completely different things with it and I don't want to be lumped up with capitalist nut-jobs like you :P