You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: My problem with Communism

in #communism7 years ago (edited)

Practical - Now that is hard ^^

You see Socialism is a wild field and very unclearly defined, also changing through the times.

The Definition I "experienced" when I was a child is: S. is the step before communism.
The most commonly held basis is that S. is the socio-economic form after capitalism with social ownership (and democratic rule) of - and here comes the communist part - the means of production. That is Marx/Engels definition.

But as I said there are a wide range of definitions - hundreds - and as some include communism, others include anarchy.

You may be surprised by that, but don't forget that Marx/Engels also defined communism as "without ruler and classes" (while Socialism still has those, in "real existing socialism" countries even placed a lot of worth that you are from the worker class) - which is not far from anarchy ;)

tl;dr
The main difference is that Socialism still has a ruling class, Communism not.