They have a spec and just a matter of editing some hivemind stuff. We should keep them on task. But in this case it's not like we have to do a hard fork for it (that i know of) AND the biggest piece is that they can enable the background stuff and other interfaces can make the UI happen right away even if that part takes them more time.
Will it come quickly... i hope so but not counting on it. It has been a long time to get to this point.
Okay, but what I meant is that Steemit never used to call for feedback/opinions, they just did things, and announced them later. People got upset. Now, they put out fake calls for feedback/opinions. They don't care what the feedback is, or what the opinions are. They just don't want to be accused anymore, of not asking for feedback. It's a show, and we're the suckers.
Much thought has gone into the communities design recommendation. As it's meant to be an open standard, it's important to collect feedback to encourage its use as an interoperable protocol when it goes live.
I can understand what you're saying... in fact I spoke up and was disappointed that after working with them for a while on communities they went back into private among their team and kind of just listed their results... BUT, this is the biggest part it's not final... I hope they're being honest in their call for feedback before implementation. Because it's true not all of their decisions have a track record of working super well so it really is hopeful they're looking for good input.
However with that said there's not nearly enough feedback happening here. There's some... but not like we really need.
They have a spec and just a matter of editing some hivemind stuff. We should keep them on task. But in this case it's not like we have to do a hard fork for it (that i know of) AND the biggest piece is that they can enable the background stuff and other interfaces can make the UI happen right away even if that part takes them more time.
Will it come quickly... i hope so but not counting on it. It has been a long time to get to this point.
Okay, but what I meant is that Steemit never used to call for feedback/opinions, they just did things, and announced them later. People got upset. Now, they put out fake calls for feedback/opinions. They don't care what the feedback is, or what the opinions are. They just don't want to be accused anymore, of not asking for feedback. It's a show, and we're the suckers.
Much thought has gone into the communities design recommendation. As it's meant to be an open standard, it's important to collect feedback to encourage its use as an interoperable protocol when it goes live.
I can understand what you're saying... in fact I spoke up and was disappointed that after working with them for a while on communities they went back into private among their team and kind of just listed their results... BUT, this is the biggest part it's not final... I hope they're being honest in their call for feedback before implementation. Because it's true not all of their decisions have a track record of working super well so it really is hopeful they're looking for good input.
However with that said there's not nearly enough feedback happening here. There's some... but not like we really need.