There are other users like @geekgirl who basically asked the same question. If you read this statement, it is a natural response (if you read details) as it was different from what blocktrades wrote yesterday and the phrase itself is vague.
And so far I tried to help two sides make compromise(i got some english postings about this also), but it seems that the split is inevitable.
Not sure how Hive would turn out, but I wish good luck.
It is vague I agree, but my understanding is if you are actively voting the STEEMIT stake voted witness, you will be excluded from the airdrop, as the whole intent of the fork and airdrop is to promote more decentralization. Hence my initial joke. If this is part of some strategy on your part to promote decentralization, I hope you will be able to articulate that soon, as the snapshot is happening soon.
I don't think my opinion would be heard to the "Hive leaders" anyway, so I won't waste my energy.
If one truly believes that the purpose of this fork is to promote decentralization, I believe that it is absurd to exclude people with different opinions (and who is making this decision? Seems that it is "centralized")
Opinions did not exclude you. Your actions did.
Exactly. Why would I want to airdrop you the same attack vector you used against the consensus witnesses on an entirely new chain?
Very good point.
IT seem that idea is to escape centralization to ... centralization :/
Learn what centralization is before posting stupid comments.
Agreed.