They want to censor a part of the community simply because they disagreed with their view on the matter. How much more toxic can it get.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
They want to censor a part of the community simply because they disagreed with their view on the matter. How much more toxic can it get.
I still give 'benefit of doubt'. No answer yet.
Not giving an airdrop to someone is not censorship.
I agree with you, but i do not think this is the case at all.
It seems these accounts may be excluded completely.
They'll have 'their' steem 'network' soon.
Don't understand the rant of the people who voted for steemit stake. Now you'll have a weaker chain to control more easily.
Not in support of the soft fork doesn't necessarily mean one's in support of what JSun did. Don't mistake the two of them.
Good point, my fault there :)
Anyway, (in my opinion) seeing what JS did validated entirely the need of the Soft Fork. The takeover it's the proof which shows that the elected witnesses we're correct.
Greetings and have a good day.
Thank you.
Have a great day, @empoderat.