That really is funny. Each of us basically live two separate realities in a way (at least). Our Emotional Mind has a ideal utopia that it is constantly judging reality against. It actually creates the Analytical Mind to provide the logical conditions that need to change in the real world to reasonably bring it's perception closer to it's utopia. The Analytical Mind get's it's motivation and existence from the will of the Emotional Mind and thus is subject to the Emotional Mind. Emotional Mind never wants to change and only does so:
1)When the Analytical mind conveniences the Emotional Mind that doing so will get it closer to the ideal utopia.
2)When the Analytical mind has more success than it gains creditability. Less success and it looses creditability. The Emotional Mind uses a binary system to determine this. 1 for success and 0 for failures.
- When the right associated neural pathways are used to get the right format for the different processors.
- When the person decides to train his brain and use language to get the neural plasticity to rebuild the neural pathways to the right processor.
When all these conditions are met the Emotional Minds observation can function the way it is supposed to and you can get mad, sad, happy appropriately. The same thing happens to the Analytical Mind. Its observation change and allow for a closer comprehension and understanding of natural law. Which it was built to perceive.
These conditions are met when you stop mixing up emotional language with analytical language.
Mixed up example: The reason I like chocolate is because it taste better.
Liking something has nothing to to with logic or reason. This is a preference.
Taste has nothing to do with logic or reason. This is a preference.
Saying things like this means the incorrect associated data goes to the wrong processor. It is like trying to open up a video file with a document program. Not working right if at all.