Well gang sounds like Teflon Don Trump may be starting to let the failed policy of the past and the deep state stick to his legacy. Now some assert it makes absolutely no sense for Assad to engage in such horrendous attack. Now from deontological ethics that doesnt view humans as means to an end, this is totally true. But from the teleological ethics that usually rules in the realm of amoral anarchist global policy that views lives as liberty as things that can be sacrificed and nationalized in the claimed name of public welfare. Those who claim no teleologic reason for Assad to mass kill 60 innocent is Trump already announced a pull out and there is nothing to gain. Unfortunately, doing such attack even with Western influence still sticking around in the area is a good way to test the waters, and doing so communicates to the domestic policy the unchallenged might of Assad's forces and communicates the West will not be back no matter what.
Though I don't hold it impossible Assad could be a total monster, I question those who expect us to believe them without evidence. Where was Saddam's WMDs? Did the USS Maddox actually take fire from North Vietnamese, and even if it did, did it justify the lives and loot pissed away in the region because of it? More close to the issues at hand, it sounds like MIT professor Theodore Postol has an interesting report about how past chemical weapons attacks supposedly by Assad were not accurately covered and analyzed by Western Media.
Furthermore, if dying from chemicals is so much worse than bullets or shrapnel, what about the failing New York Times statistic of 52 times (by 2016) ISIS had used chemical weapons. If deposing Assad leads to strengthening ISIS, is it not possible the net amount of lives killed by chemical weapons would be higher without Assad--arguendo Assad has done any or all of the chemical weapons attacks he is accused of?
Overall, the facts are reality is a social construct, they got nearly 1% of us behind bars, many for victimless conduct in Murca, and a lawless entity has already silenced Julian Assange's free speech and has a history of extrajudicial assassinations, indefinite detention and torture for those it's global apparatuses can gain custody over. There are tyrants everywhere and it would be nice to live in a free world where those who act with aggression not in legitimate means are specifically deterred. Would be nice to do away with all the insane leviathan statism of the status quo--but you know a world with actual peace doesn't have weapons and arms manufacturers so some stand to lose a whole bunch of loot if we quit playing their game. Perhaps we could pay them a certain price and they will quit with their wayward pursuit of media and government apparatuses.
Sources
https://www.globalresearch.ca/assessment-of-white-house-intelligence-report-about-nerve-agent-attack-in-khan-shaykhun-syria/5584867
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/world/middleeast/isis-chemical-weapons-syria-iraq-mosul.html
Author unlicenses any copyright interest in this article, but also does not give any warranties
Any copyrightable material created by the article’s author is released into the public domain. Images and video used are from Pixabay and other sources and may also be unlicensed. If you have questions about what this means and what you can do perhaps hire an attorney since your law is so complex.
American terrorism is at its peak. They started it from Afghanistan then Iraq now Syria. Asking Muslims are terrorist & attacking them & killing innocent people. Lastly the attached in Afghanistan led killing of more than hundred innocent students. We condemn strongly the terrorist attacks & acts of America & allied. Killing the humanity & innocents around the globe for resources & power is actually the terrorism.
Yes, very sad the world we live in with little justice and little accountability.
"They started it from Afghanistan..."
Correction on two levels. First, this is 'globalist controlled' USA. There is no sovereign USA, nor has there been for over a century.
Second, "this has been going on" since the 19th century when globalist controlled USA invaded the sovereign kingdom of Hawaii and the sovereign countries of South America. In the name of 'regime change' of that time, to secure real estate that grew cane sugar.
Yea it will be interesting what history records, it seems most are largely ignorant of what is going on today let alone the past
Yup. You got it right.
yea, interesting ideas, thanks for them, hope steem is going well for both of you
Yup. 👍👍
indeed, hope the weekend is going well and steem is going well for you
👍👍
What horror, have mercy!
Yea c'est la vie, hopefully it doesnt escalate
USA is always doing that and then afterwards, you'll see them preach about Human Rights. They're the one dropping bombs but blaming other countries when someone gets killed.
Yea, its terrible what is going on, in the name of freedom when it does the opposite.
you think that assad wasnt gassing his own people?
Or khahdafi or Saddam Hussein weren't attacking muslims of different sects?
And the Saudis arent bombing yemen muslims?
Or the uae isn't trying to get in with the us and cut Qatar out of its alliance.
Or Iran support terrorism against anyone who doesn't support there style of religion
Or the fighting in Pakistan and egypt....are because of a us looking to nation build?
That's absurd, scapegoating..
@richatvns, what do you think of Theodore Posotol's report questioning the official story of past claims of Assad chemical attacks?
Hola,
I suggest people check out x22report. "Dave" is really interesting. He's all about Q but does the best job of synthesizing of anyone, imo. Also he relates the geopolitical to the economic and in that way paints a coherent picture.
Basically about the Syria attack, he's saying Trump is playing the MSM and flushing out the Deep State ops in Syria. It's all about 4-D chess, so I don't know for sure either, but he did correctly call that nothing of importance would be hit and no one would really be hurt, which was true.
This is different from Jerome Corsi and some other patriots , whom I admire, but who seem despite their connections and background and intelligence don't seem to see or may don't talk about the actual big picture... namely, that attack was an attack on Syria but rather an attack on the Deep State....
Yea I don't trust this Q stuff, Snowden has done heroic acts, perhaps there is more to the story, but I find it highly questionable the Q stuff going against Snowden?
Hm, I know Q was ambivalent about Snowden for a bit but I think he/they settled on Snowden as a white hat (?), not sure, haven't followed lately.
Anyway x22 report today is saying how the attacks were actually on Deep State assets in Syria.... kinda makes sense....
Here's my post from today btw, https://steemit.com/funny/@elderchild/red-pill-blue-pill-2-antarctica
Cheerio
interesting ideas hope the weekend is enjoyable for you
go get em steem police
recommend making more meaningful comment, some down vote comments that could be for any post