Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago  

    That is a good point @homosymbion, however only one technology has been theorized to do such. The Directed Energy Weapon or DEW. Which is also called the Star Wars Energy Weapon.

    Find some sources like this or this and cite them with your argument. The deeper we go, the more convoluted the answers.

    My argument was simply in opposition of the planes causing a collapse.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago (edited) 

      I intend to stepwise explain how this technology works. It is all to do with electrons and their analogues charge clusters and the different states of matter that they can initiate due to the fact that all leptons (electrons, muons, tauons) interact with gravity, the weak force (like casimir and van der walls that normally holds matter together as solid or liquid) and electromagnetic.

      By using a static electric field (the interferometer ELF EM driven man-made Hurricane 'Erin' at its peak strength and parked off New York on 911) to order the normally chaotic energy flux in the vacuum, in combination with more interferrometry and microwaves, the technology can

      • make metal glow when not hot (observed in NIST pictures and videos and miss-attributed to nano-thermite)
      • make metal soften ( molten metal testimony long time after towers fell from workers )
      • dustify metal in mid-air (by flipping the weak force and by rapid oxidation / transmutation at surface boundaries)
      • anti-gravity effects, seen in NIST photos where cars are flipped and an ambulance is not crushed by the destruction of tower 1 and a fire fighter in the building that reported that he had to grab his hat which was floating off his head.
      • wierd fires (which a fire fighters testimony states that they cannot be put out by water)
      • production of tritium (along with the nano particulates accounts for the 70 types of cancers found in people such as first responders and clean up personal and will account for more deaths in time than those that perished on that day)
      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         7 years ago  

        Sounds like some of these points are contradictory to modern physics. Maybe you should write a well-researched article with clear sources.

        Such a technology, if it exists, would be a prime candidate for the cause of the collapse. Though it is merely speculation without evidence.

        Just to be clear, I don't buy the official dialog. Keep truth-seeking.

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           7 years ago  

          Follow @homosymbion and @mfmp and you will get the answers you seek.

          We are conducting experiments. live.

          $0.00
            Reply