It seems to have thought about this for quite a long time.
I'm going to keep it in memo format.
I posted it on my facebook yesterday, but I also share it here.
How to read's' : the question of how to read or why to read.
In the near future, 'person with content' will become more important. That said, everyone will think of image editors, mobile content creators, knowledge brokers, and micro celeb. There will be more platforms, and among them useful platforms, regardless of size, will be in their own domain. The 'person with content' contributes to the production or sharing of knowledge within it.
In the future, the issue of compensation for it can become important. There are people who spread good information and contribute to someone's reputation, while at the same time getting their own reputation. The success of the platform lies in how it solves the monetary and social rewards for its contribution. That's why I look forward to SteamIt, and I want to find out the possibility here.
But what is the 'content' when you say 'person with content'? I think it is a 'perspective'. Viewpoints come from observations and thoughts. It is 'reading' to learn it quickly. There is reading for book and some for viewing the facebook timeline. The goal of reading is not to read the book to the end. Do not do that. We read to have our own thoughts.
So you can read it roughly. You do not have to understand the author's thoughts. There is no reason to write, speak or explain the subject of this book. One sentence remains. One word remains. The idea that comes out of it is born. That is important. Movies, dramas, cartoons and so on. 'Reading' is merely a means.
It is the point of view to get through reading and thinking, and if that viewpoint is accumulated, it becomes 'insight'. And the insight is the individual's competitive content. Writing, painting, and video are all tools to organize and communicate this 'insight'.
Insight does not come from someone's thoughts. Your point of view and thought are insights. And it comes to me through another person. The former sentence and the latter are inconsistent, but not. It is important to think about the impression received from the object than to understand it well.
Insight is also the most important asset for anyone who wants to create content. I have to worry about detail and deeply how to make this an item that can be solved by business. Who do you aim for, why do they want this output, what can I give them, whether they are superior to alternative alternatives, or what more is needed for them.
If the result is an article, you have to consider the style, tone, and nuance. It does not matter whether you take the criteria yourself, take it as a reader, or benchmark a role model. The style that suits me is important. From the past, it is the virtue that was emphasized, but it has come to an era where one must always pay attention to style and concept.
Especially when it comes to surviving as an "individual with content" in the era of the platform. This is my problem I have to worry about.
Now, my point is that the reader should be invented, not discovering. I'll talk about that later.
Congratulations @lazicat! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP