I makes sense only if the person is of bad character. Taking that into account, his adolescent reason for not upvoting the post is shallow arrogance and the reason for commenting was simply to steal from the awards pool for monetary gain.
This huge flaw in Steemit is why I will no longer support the platform.
The protocol was designed so Ned could become rich. He is a fake and Steemit will fail. It is certainly not the Bitcoin of Social Media, it's a mirror of the failed real world of Western Politics, which is a Centralized Oligarchy.
You know what, @notconvinced, I don't appreciate that kind of negativity on this post. You're free to say what you want, of course, but I'm trying to make Steemit a better place, and you're here shitting on the whole idea of it. There are good people here, having fun, being themselves. No, it isn't perfect, but it's also very new. Witnesses are the ones helping drive this ship. It can be changed. If you don't like it, leave, or do something to improve the platform instead of bitching about it.
Yes, I think @fyrst-witness could've made himself look good and shot this post to the trending page. Whatever. All I know is what I'm about, and I'm going to continue to work hard to make this platform a better place. If you're not going to do the same, please go elsewhere.
Yes, people need to see opposing views. I'm not against you pointing out what needs to be fixed. What I don't get is you badmouthing the platform in general, when you're here. You don't support Steemit, but you're here. Doesn't make sense to me. But you do you. Peace.
Yeah right !! Iam like WTF. Doesn 't make a lick of sense to me why people would do that
I makes sense only if the person is of bad character. Taking that into account, his adolescent reason for not upvoting the post is shallow arrogance and the reason for commenting was simply to steal from the awards pool for monetary gain.
This huge flaw in Steemit is why I will no longer support the platform.
The protocol was designed so Ned could become rich. He is a fake and Steemit will fail. It is certainly not the Bitcoin of Social Media, it's a mirror of the failed real world of Western Politics, which is a Centralized Oligarchy.
You know what, @notconvinced, I don't appreciate that kind of negativity on this post. You're free to say what you want, of course, but I'm trying to make Steemit a better place, and you're here shitting on the whole idea of it. There are good people here, having fun, being themselves. No, it isn't perfect, but it's also very new. Witnesses are the ones helping drive this ship. It can be changed. If you don't like it, leave, or do something to improve the platform instead of bitching about it.
Yes, I think @fyrst-witness could've made himself look good and shot this post to the trending page. Whatever. All I know is what I'm about, and I'm going to continue to work hard to make this platform a better place. If you're not going to do the same, please go elsewhere.
Well said, i knew i liked you. You ever decide to run for witness...
So if another's truth doesn't match yours it's negative? Sounds quite fake to me.
People need to understand the opposing view to know what fixes are needed. Your shallow view will fix nothing.
I will choose to stay or leave at MY will. Peace out!
Yes, people need to see opposing views. I'm not against you pointing out what needs to be fixed. What I don't get is you badmouthing the platform in general, when you're here. You don't support Steemit, but you're here. Doesn't make sense to me. But you do you. Peace.
Why is your understanding necessary?
If you believe that, why are you still here?
Rhetorical question. Also I don't really care what the answer is.