昨天《“月旦评”第九期优秀作品最终获奖名单》公布后，有小伙伴微信问我，“月旦评”的最终获奖名单是如何确定的呢？今天就给大家来通过这篇文章详细说明下。
“月旦评”从去年八月份来，其实活动的规则一直都不断在改进和完善，从最初的评委推荐入选，然后公众投票到后来增加的评委每期打分，到上期我们开始的评委先推荐，最后公众投票和评委打分同时进行。。。相信一直参与或留意“月旦评”的小伙伴们已经很熟悉了，这里我就不再重复啰嗦了，只是重点讲下获奖的评选环节。
从上一期开始，也就是5月份，我们的规则是每周先由评委组老师们推荐文章，每周五晚上公布一次，每个月四次，然后接下来是公众投票，为保障更为公正的机会，投票时间大约会持续一周左右，与此同时，在投票结束的前一天，我们也会将评委组老师们的统一打分汇总，并计算出平均值，这样保障对作品的打分更为客观。
接着，我们会统计出公众投票的数字，现在是每一票一分，并将其累加到先前评委组平均打分的对应作品上，得出作品的最后得分，然后再根据得分高低依次排名。
因为我们目前设有文学奖和艺术奖两个奖项，所以排名也是分两开单独计算，也就是文学和艺术各选取其排名的前三名者作为入选奖，所在组的得分最高者即为当期最佳优秀奖。
为了让大家看的更直观和清晰些，我们现在将我们的评分“秘密”截图下来，一目了然。
当然，我们也深知任何规则难免会有其缺点，“月旦评”评选机制也不例外，但我们同时又坚信它是当下我们认为最好的，因为我们一直也的确在改进和不断完善规则中。
再次感谢所有支持和参与“月旦评”的小伙伴们！当然喽，也非常感谢我们的评委组各位老师们！
规则越来越完善了！
支持这样的好活动
上榜的都是文艺才子。厉害。
辛苦了
大伟哥和各位评委一直为月旦评这个活动动用着自己的时间，辛苦大家啦👍
不错的活动，我参加了好几个。希望中奖 哈哈
厉害了我的哥~O(∩_∩)O
内部评分尽心尽责啊，赞一个
参加了两次，可能写的太差了，我都不知道评委有么有看到过我的文章，哈哈哈~
大家都好认真
原来评分制度是这样的，谢谢大伟哥与各位评委的用心良苦！
感谢所有的评委和小伙伴，努力争取入围。获奖暂时不敢想🤓
中文区第一活动
好像好久没写东西参加了~😂😂
感觉越来越正式了，这个活动以后一定是CN区第一大的活动咯~
感谢主办方，感谢评委老师们！
非常感谢你们的用心付出！
会一直支持、参与！
English Version Of This Article Written By @rivalhw!
The "secret" in "The Moonlight Commentary"
Yesterday, after the publication of “The Final Winner List of the 9th Period Excellent Works of the “Monthly Review””, a small partner and WeChat asked me how the final winner list of the “Monthly Review” was determined. Let us give you a detailed explanation of this article today.
The “Monthly Review” has come from August last year. In fact, the rules of the campaign have been continuously improving and improving. They were selected from the initial jury selection, and then the public voted to the later added judges to score each time, and the judges that we started in the previous period were recommended first. Finally, the public vote and the judges scored at the same time. . . It is believed that the small partners who have been involved in or pay attention to the “New Moonlight Review” are already familiar with it. I will not repeat it here, but I will focus on the winning selection process.
From the beginning of the previous period, that is, in May, our rule is to recommend articles by teachers of the judging panel once a week, every Friday evening, once every month, and then followed by public voting to ensure more In fairness, the voting time will last approximately one week. At the same time, on the day before the end of the voting, we will also aggregate the scores of the judges’ teachers and calculate the average value. This will ensure that the scores of the works will be more assured. objective.
Then, we will count the number of public votes, which is now one point for each vote, and add them to the corresponding works of the previous rating team to get the final score of the work, and then rank them according to the score.
Because we currently have two awards: Literature Award and Art Award, the rankings are also calculated separately. That is, the top three individuals in the literature and arts are selected as the selection prize. The highest score in the group is the current period. Best Excellence Award.
In order to make everyone see more intuitive and clearer, we now take a screenshot of our rating “secret” and see it at a glance.
Of course, we also know that any rule will inevitably have its shortcomings. The “Monthly Review” selection mechanism is no exception, but we also believe that it is the best we currently think because we have always improved and continuously improved the rules. .
Thanks again to all the small partners who support and participate in the "Monthly Review!" Of course, we are very grateful to our judges teachers!
Thanks for sharing the secrets of Moonlight Commentary. All the best @rivalhw and Stay Blessed!
hhhjvbnjb
赞！
评委们辛苦了。感谢这样的好活动