I don't want to be mean/rude, but a fact is a fact.
This contest is mainly for people, who don't have enough bandwidth to leave comments.
I currently have 80.804 Steem Power, and it's currently enough for 100+ comments.
So 45.433 Steem Power should be enough for 50+ comments.
There are many more people with less Steem Power, especially new users, and they can only write a few comments before they run out of RC (Resource Credits).
For example @jhayehidio.
He currently have 0.136 Steem Power + 14.878 Steem Power delegation.
According to Steemd, he currently have 76.19% (11.5M / 15M) RC (Resource Credits), and this amount of Steem Power is enough for 14 comments.
His RC (Resource Credits) recharge rate is 3M per day.
1 comment costs approximately 0.78M.
Another example: @darknyx.
She currently have 0.000 Steem Power + 15.016 Steem Power delegation.
According to Steemd, she currently have 100.00% (18M) RC (Resource Credits), and this amount of Steem Power is enough for 23 comments. Her RC (Resource Credits) recharge rate is 3.6M per day.
I have no intention of pulling down anybody. I just wrote a fact.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Last time I checked you're not one of the judges. If we begin to walk through the path you're following then we would nominate everyone not minding how active they are. These ones you mentioned, how active are they? The person I nominated has been adding so much value to the blockchain. Go through the blog and check.
I could give reasons why your nominations are wrong but I wouldn't want to drag issues or spoil someone's favor. I repeat. Allow the judges to decide, they are not daft, neither are they blind to see.
If they told you to help them check, then I'd not bother. The ones you mentioned could be fake accounts anyways.
Just nominate whoever you want and allow judges to decide. I won't give you another reply but I do hope you'll learn to mind your business.
You are correct, I am not one of the judges, but everyone is free to express their opinion.
@jhayehidio is registered on Steemit on 2018.03.06.
He has been actively upvoted/upvoting posts on a daily basis since many months, but he started to be active with resteeming 4 days ago (2018.10.18), and he wrote his introduction post 14 hours ago (2018.10.22, 03:46 CEST).
@darknyx is a new user, so we currently can't talk about how active she is. She is registered on Steemit on 2018.10.13.
Their accounts are just two examples, and they could be fake. There are a lot of people with small amount of Steem Power on Steemit.
The two people you mentioned have been inactive and wouldn't value this delegation. The first registered since March and has only made 3 posts. How can you explain that.
Maybe you're the owner of these accounts.. Who knows?
The delegation should help minnows who also would add value to the blockchain. Not any random person.
Why would they give delegation to someone who's inactive. Don't come hear to shout you're stating fact. So the fact you're stating is that they should Delegate to someone that posted threes times in 7 months. Wtf.
None of them were actually inactive.
The first one isn't posted anything for months, but he upvoted posts on a daily basis.
The second one is a new user, so we can't speak about her activity level yet.
These accounts are just two examples, and I have nothing to do with their accounts. I have only one Steemit account. This one.
The fact that I stating is that the account you nominated above (@greenewalks) is in no serious need of Steem Power delegation, and there are a lot of people, who have less Steem Power than he have. But I still upvoted your comment, because I appreciate the fact you nominated someone else, and not yourself.
Maybe I came up with two not so good examples, but I am sure you understand what I mean.