Suggestion on rephrasing the question: I just sent a transaction sponsoring someone and I’m not seeing an upvote on my posts. How do I check that it was not missed in processing?
Yes, it is possible that your transaction could have been missed but before concluding to that, check first your rshares and ensure that you have enough for the threshold of $0.011. If you have low rshares, there could be missed days of upvote because your upvotes can either have been accumulated for one "big" upvote or divided into few days of smaller but significant upvotes. This is rather than daily upvotes of dust value.
If your rshares are clearly enough or even more than the threshold, your transaction could have indeed been missed. If that is the case, I suggest that you contact @steembasicincome through Discord.
This used to be accurate. Since we released our automated system a few weeks ago, enrollments are processed automatically within 2.4 hours. The confirmation transactions are still manual and typically sent within 2 days. New members start with enough balance for an initial vote, but after the initial vote the frequency depends on their enrollment level. Members with only 1 unit will see upvotes very infrequently (sporadic upvotes of $0.011 instead of regular tiny upvotes).
You are welcome to edit your submission and I will review again (or you can resubmit if your edit is substantial.)
Edit: Looks good now. Response accepted as a qualifying submission.
Don't forget you can also earn points by scoring the clarity and helpfulness of other qualifying responses.
I initially answered the question based on my own experience and not going through the old posts. With your reply, I reviewed the documents and found the answer that is almost the same as my initial answer. That tells me, the post is outdated and a new one is out there. I guess this is where the importance of a @steembasicinome web page comes in so that we users will just go to that web page instead of digging very old posts.
I have updated my response. 😊
Yep, there is a lot of old information, and we know that a lot of important updates get missed for various reasons. That's the purpose of this exercise: to help people better understand the new changes and create a new FAQ in the process.
We do have a web-site launch in our roadmap, but it's not our top priority.
Rating 5 - a good attempt, details are ok but it is technical and difficult to follow for a new user. One of the harder questions to create a simple, clear summary.
Rated 6. Very accurate but I just feel you can better explain or present that for the sake of a common user or noob. Explaining with rshares will make it confusing to a noob.