I understand what you mean, that low-quality must be moderated not depending on who publishes it, but why do you consider our content us low-quality? It's a good content, we've worked hard to create it and we share it on many social-media platforms like FB and twitter, and it's the same everywhere, short post with a link to read more, why shouldn't we consider Steemit as a good media platform for promotion?
Why don't you downvote dlike posts then?
I'm going to give steemit steemit users a chance to follow us and stay updated with the recent news, we don't take them out if the blockchain, we deliver our product on it. And I'm going to use bidbots to reach us much audience as I can. And since my strategy showing pretty good results I hope others will follow my example as well.
And I'm sure this will cause steem to develop a bigger community and some day good writers won't need to use bidbots at all...
Posted using Partiko Android
Sorry for the miscommunication.
I didn't mean to suggest the articles are low quality (well except for that one we discussed w the spelling / grammar issues).
The articles I checked look fine. I'm just saying they don't really bring anything additional to Steem in terms of value to the network.
If all anybody did was fill Trending up with cross posts, do you think there will be more incentive or less incentive for content consumers to come to our chain?
That's pretty much the issue. Hope we are more or less on the same page now.
Posted using Partiko Android