That's a valid point for sure, that they may have that line of reasoning; but to create a possibility of the U.S. dollar collapsing by not having control of something that they could easily take control of doesn't sound very strategic to me (they essentially have an unlimited supply, so why not have a majority stake in BTC AS WELL as have, of course, full control of the USD).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
*majority stake/large stake (not necessarily majority)