Although, I'm not sure, but you may be able to comment/upvote via the API without actually opening the Steemit page, so if it is keying off the interaction with the application, that could be happening too.
Yeah, definitely a possibility. I imagine it could be related to the amount of data in the post (comments, etc.), since I know that I've seen issues with the 'wallet' page when there are a lot of transactions. :)
yes i strongly agree with you you most of people are just upvote post without reading
While our first step is to learn from steemit
2646 upvotes does not mateer matter is that how many people reas your post and enjoy from it and also learn from your post
Iappereciate you that you put a deep point in your post keep it up
It really hurts because it takes lot of effort for a genuine writer to write his original content and not get proper response because this had happened with me earlier
I think there are ways to do that, honestly. I believe you can post through a third-party app too and if it is only counting views on Steemit.com (rather than something like busy, etc.) that would cause it. Not to mention, if it was just votes, you can vote via steemvoter without viewing the page. That said, it appears the article has updated, so it likely was/is a bug/scaling problem.
nice
I guess anything is possible when you have that much steem power. 😂🤣
I think so...
ok but how do you explain it has 600 comments and 23 views?
Although, I'm not sure, but you may be able to comment/upvote via the API without actually opening the Steemit page, so if it is keying off the interaction with the application, that could be happening too.
Still I tend to think it is a bug, an update delay!
Yeah, definitely a possibility. I imagine it could be related to the amount of data in the post (comments, etc.), since I know that I've seen issues with the 'wallet' page when there are a lot of transactions. :)
Yeah, definitely a possible bug. As I posted it I realized that could be at play too, so have updated the article.
see it has been updated now.
but that being said, maybe it's cached, maybe it only refreshes once in a while.
if you use the api commenting is possible without opening the article itself, i know i've done it, but yes can be seen as a bug either way.
Thanks for the update! :) I'll update the article accordingly!
yes i strongly agree with you you most of people are just upvote post without reading
While our first step is to learn from steemit
2646 upvotes does not mateer matter is that how many people reas your post and enjoy from it and also learn from your post
Iappereciate you that you put a deep point in your post keep it up
It really hurts because it takes lot of effort for a genuine writer to write his original content and not get proper response because this had happened with me earlier
I need these kind of votes. Lol @biddle
2600 votes for a post!!! Wow, that was a monster hit...
haha Big time. lol
Steemit, where its not what you post, its who you know....
Sad man...
Interesting look into how Steemit works. I'd been wondering how many people are just upvoting down their feed... Thanks for sharing and for noticing.
You're very welcome! Also, keep in mind that this could be a bug too, not sure! :)
"2600 Votes And Only 23 Views"- Totally amazing....
I guess autovotes set for him any his followers.
Could be for sure
No need to worry. It's possible for @jerrybanfield.
I can't see the useful of hidden that you have read the content!
Yeah you are right im agree with you my bro...its a valuable post keep it up @biddle
Interesting look into how Steemit works.
Ya, you are right. Some people do like this. I agree with you.
very nice sr good post.
it is clear that everybody motive themselves by accepting upvotes
true if a good article then people feel happy for children read it
Haha possibly a bug... I don't think that there is an API that allows doing that. 🤣🤣
I think there are ways to do that, honestly. I believe you can post through a third-party app too and if it is only counting views on Steemit.com (rather than something like busy, etc.) that would cause it. Not to mention, if it was just votes, you can vote via steemvoter without viewing the page. That said, it appears the article has updated, so it likely was/is a bug/scaling problem.
It's probably voting bots Honestly I think there should be a cap on the amount a post can earn.