I'm not sure what I am getting out of this. That they are using a marketing ploy to get people engaged in a system that likely a lot of us don't understand.
Or Am I suppose to find a company that has people who look really old and "know" what they are doing?
This was a very unproductive and very minimal review of a company that is known as the EOS of China. Like NEO is the Ethereum of China...
Cool
I'll look at it again tomorrow, to be honest I was a bit flippant and quick to condemn. I look at about 20 whitepapers a day and I have checklists for projects that appear viable, I probably skimmed this pretty fast. This doesn't tick a lot of boxes for me but MAYBE it's an awesome project poorly wrapped.
The main questions I have are:
Tell me what your project does concisely in one second
Show some evidence that your project is more than an idea and you have the capability to deliver.
I don't see good answers here, sorry... like I say, I'll look again and amend if appropriate. BTW, everything is the "EOS/Ethereum/bitcoin" of China, or an "ethereum killer". It doesnt mean shit if no one is committing on github.
First look at economies of scale. We are not living in the tech economy just yet.
Now when governments and townships have adopted tech with real products there comes scalability because funding is generated from a fiat stability rather than a crowdfunded ico.
That's the way I tend to look at it. Maybe the tech is there but it can be replicated and if you are part of the supply demand chain you make it.