I agree an SJW’s interpretation of Dverse would most likely evoke a positive association. Until…
“okay you want diversity, then we are going to give it to you, but you won’t like what diversity really is in the real world where meritocracy matters and people can choose.”
But I reckon any subsequent clash of interpretations would be a welcome point of discussion. Perhaps resulting in a consuming of the false one. In any case I think Dverse serves both masters enough to strongly consider.
Whereas if we named it AppConsolidator or AppTamer, then people might actually appreciate the meaning.
I think exploring the best way to convey this would be a good line of inquiry. I’m not sure about calling it AppConsolidator (but maybe AppTamer) as it describes more the purpose to me. But something like ‘Edapt’: the App consolidator powered by Etonomy.
BTW, I take your point with regard to marrying two concepts that shouldn’t wed. I guess I like the idea that any native or third party dApp would include the ‘E’ token symbol to strengthen its association with Etonomy (‘cos it’s a friggin great name IMO)…
My wife suggested ‘FedApp’ when I was explaining the concept of a federated/consolidated app to replace the overload we currently deal with. She then went on a marketing pitch “Fed up with using so many apps? Use FedApp - The only federated Application you’ll ever need”… I thought it was pretty cool after a few drinks :)