I am totally talking from a 'place of ignorance.' I stated as much. I have no expertise in anything and base my opinions on the same lack of depth your average(or below average) person does.
For the most part I was inviting more education because I was using the white paper only as the basis for my questions(I did quickly go to the site to try and figure out where this world domination was supposed to spawn from).
I picked on the moderation remark because that seemed like a pc sort of thing they stuck in there for the sake of pc. Maybe I shouldn't expect arbitrary political correctness to not be present in a white paper.
I haven't played any sort of videogame in many years, so I find things like coin burn insurance to be tedious and odd. As an investor I think a mechanism that effectively caps the value of an investment to be equally as odd.
The white paper, in my opinion, reads extremely heavy on the youthful optimism. Maybe I'm just old and haven't read enough white papers yet.
Ignorance is wisdom compared to those who think they already know everything. The fact that you're actually reading the white paper puts you ahead of your average person. :)
The world domination remark is standard marketing hopefulness. These ICO whitepapers are often just a form of marketing, so I've gotten used to it. Most people wouldn't consider investing in a project that didn't at least claim to want to be largely successful. But yeah, details in terms of marketing promotions and such would be helpful, but it's still quite early on in the process (which is why I consider this a long-term speculation). Once the first full version of game is running, then I imagine things will ramp up in terms of partnerships with businesses and such.
Youthful optimism often changes the world so don't knock it too hard.
Again, thank you for comments. I enjoyed them.