She was 14 but even if she had been 15, the age of consent in that State is 16, so yeah, it was rape since she was not old enough to consent.
So here we are in the presence of people being face with a dilemma. Do we support the accuser, a guy who raped a child or do we support the accused who seems to have made money with spam Emails and viagra sales. I don't care about any of them but if I need to chose sides, it will never be the side of a sex offender.
Also, for someone with half a brain, we can see form the chat the the accuser AKA sex offender is trying to blackmail the accused AKA spam king.
It really bothers me, to see people shocked at Email spam but OK with rape!
whether Jonathan is a rapist murderer or other doesn't change any details or facts about Richard heart the conversation doesn't require trust of opinion or character
questions asked were on his connections to criminals in peurto rico and money laundering since Richard Heart is releasing ICO himself and considering his experience as an internet scammer its logical to say hes scamming again