This series of posts would be more useful and more informative if it included fair and unbiased assessments of the historical value and accuracy of these TA pundits.
Personally it seems like a lot of nonsense. Many of the so-called recommendations from the TA crowd are of the nature - it may go up, it may go down, it all depends.
Not actionable or provably right or wrong.
In the few cases where they go out on a limb and support strong up or strong down, they seem to be wrong as often as they are right.
Averaging a bunch of nonsense just produces nonsense.
Any evidence any of these pundits is better than 50/50?