Agree with that, but numbers of tranzactions will be massive for a coin who wants to be mass addapted.
Doesnt mather if others have bigger fees if they have few tranzactions per minute/hour.
Makes sense?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
no, every cryptocurrency is created for the purpose and every one of them benefits from mass adoption. it's financial technology, what do you expect?
Again i agree with you, but beeing first mobile crypto coin doesnt give them a huge boost and notoriety compare with any other crypto?
Lets say the world will gonna change over night, dont you agree electroneum have the first chance to be mass adopted?
I will say next can be Cardano and Ripple, what do you say?
I dont support or dislake electroneum, i am trying to stay neutral, i want to talk based on what informations we have, not as a fan.
Electroneum suffers from the regular technical issues so there's a room for more stable solution but if no one contest them, they are indeed a very successful business project. I don't think "mobile currency" route gives prospects for better adoption but their aim for micropayments certainly does. There is big demand for micropayments these days.
Your article written in a way that suggests they have hidden agendas but all you described are well known business plans that Richard discussed and explained many times on different forums. Electroneum will profit from mass adoption, like anyone else would, but we need to see the reasons why that mass adoption is going to hapen or may fail.
I have listen Richard Ells last night and he said within a months they will have the instant payment recorded.
I love his vision, he wants to enter in the banking system.
I didnt say they have hidden agenda, i post it to bold what of the most users doesnt know, i see them on telegram how they talking and type of questions they ask, i tryed to explain the agenda.