Bullshit. Let the market decide. Maybe the flags are in place of a rational argument? If the market decides, why be worried?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Bullshit. Let the market decide. Maybe the flags are in place of a rational argument? If the market decides, why be worried?
Does an exchange suddenly list the S&P 500, but call it SP500Cash?
Does Honda copy the Mustang, but calls it Mustang Cash?
Does another country's treasury start printing Yuan notes and calls it Yuan Cash?
You are enabling a liar to spread his lies, dupe newbies with his duplicitous and false claims -- yet you say its the "market".
The only "market" here, is how far Roger Ver will go with his ego to shove the falsehoods down your throat.
But I know you're the head boot-licker, so I don't expect any traction.
BCash is a litmus test for logic and ethics -- and you failed it.
Why would a car company add cash to its name? I get what you are trying to say here, but by that logic, why ETH and ETC?
If the coin is shit, as you seem to think, the market will show this.
You guys all sound pretty whiny. Where’s the argument?
I am? That is news to me! I’m just a blogger nobody that is interested in both coins.
Oh well.
The classic ETH is ETC.
The new ETH fork won the economic majority as commodity based blockchain resource. (near useless as a store of value either-ways)
BCH did not.
Monies are not commodities to one-another.
BCH will either take over BTC or will die a slow dead, I think the later bet is safer.
So BCH did not win the majority. Thus the name was changed. What’s the big deal?
You are arguing in very simplistic terms. Are you drunk?
I don't care about forks of Bitcoin that want different rules.
I do care about forks of Bitcoin PRETENDING THEY ARE BITCOIN.
Guess which fork of many is doing that?
That's right, BCash.
And you still can't see it? Either you're concern trolling, or you have some mental block with logic.
If this is the quality of people that Roger Ver attracts to his cause, no wonder they're floundering like idiots.
All caps. Bizarre insults. No actual argument or pertinent rebuttal. This is about what I expected, unfortunately. Have a good day.
No answer to the mimicry and attempted usurping of Bitcoin?
So that is what passes for logic in your world, a head buried in the tarpit of ignorance.
Pathetic.
Nobody in the crypto community with an IQ above 25 has trouble differentiating between BTC and BCH.
BCH is the spiritual continuation of Bitcoin since it works as cash on-chain rather than just as a store of value. Therefore it has the moral right to use the name.
Your posts would be more pleasant without all the insults. They still wouldn't make a lot of sense, but they'd be nicer.
You're just another useful idiot that has nothing to say beyond Ver talking points and your own muddled thinking.
"Spiritual" -- get out of here with that bullshit, man you're really that pathetic that you think this whole scam is something noble?
Moral right, lol -- once the dust settles and BCash is relegated to the dustbin of history, all of you simpletons need to get together and form your own nation state of ethically lapsed mental defectives.
Just so we can keep an eye on all of you - not that there are many.
As for pleasantries, how about a downvote? You worked hard for it.
It's not a scam to try to keep Bitcoin functioning as described by Satoshi.
You don't have to say when you downvote me, you do it more or less all the time. I one the other hand only downvote you when you use insults - the difference between civilized discourse and thuggery.
Of course, since few of your posts are free from insults, in effect this means I downvote almost all of your comments too. :-)
Pseudo-intellectualism isn't your strength.
Here, have a downvote, since you obviously can't help yourself.
Are you saying that Bitcoin functioning as Satoshi intended is a scam? That Satoshi is a scam artist?
Still babbling to yourself?
Here, I'll sort you out -- have another downvote!