Breaking barriers isn't revolutionary, nor is being used by 2 banks. Bitcoin was revolutionary because it introduced blockchains. IOTA is revolutionary because it introduces the tangle. What's supposed to be revolutionary about ripple?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
cross-border transactions in 4 seconds, 1000 transactions per second, which is faster than any other cryptocurrency, they are currently working with some of the largest banks in the world, but no your right, their 75 customers probably won't use ripple at all, dont buy it!!!!!
None of what you just said makes it revolutionary. If the fastest petrol powered car went 200 mph and I produced a petrol powered car that could go 300 mph, does that make my car revolutionary? Of course it doesn't. It's merely faster. Now, what would make my car revolutionary is if it was electric and driverless. Can you see the difference?
So what if ripple can process a 1000 transactions per second? Graphene (which BitShares and Steem use) is supposed to be capable of 100,000 TPS and BitShares had 3300 TPS in May.
Just because you obviously have money invested in ripple, doesn't make it revolutionary.
As for whether people buy ripple or any other cryptocurrency, I couldn't care less. My post is intended for people who want to actually use such systems and develop for them rather than traders.
Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.