Sort:  

Why does IOTA always get so much publicity/exposure/hype and Byteball is kept in secret?

Does IOTA have any advantage over it?

Good question, especially since Byteball was created a lot earlier than IOTA!
But I think the main reason is that Byteball development seems to have been at a standstill for a long time. Not much excitement going on to draw people in?

IOTA on the other hand is forging partnerships, garnering government interest and actively developing.
I don't think it helps Byteball either that they operate on that weird chat-based system. I could've had some free Byteball once, but the whole chat-based thing was so alien to me that I didn't even bother to pick it up. In hindsight I regret it, but it does say something about the accessibility if someone like me, who knows a fair deal about crypto, already experiences such a big hurdle.

Do you know why blockchains and even Byteball, which has no blockchain store their entire history of transactions instead of current states or 2-3 last states at worse?
It seems redundant, but I guess it has a justification.
It also hurts privacy.

I don't know about hashgraph but I do know that with blockchain it doesn't store the 'state' of your wallet at all. It only stores all the transactions from the beginning, and when you access your wallet it actually goes through all of the transactions from the beginning to calculate (recalculate?) your current wallet's worth. In no way and in no moment is ever a 'snapshot' taken of your wallet contents because that's not how the blockhain works.

Basically if we start with 100 coins, the blockchain will only store that 50 went to you, and 50 went to me, then 25 of mine went to you and 10 of yours later went to me. Your wallet software then calculates that based on these transactions your wallet contains: 50-25+10=35 coins. Without knowing the previous transactions you cannot calculate this.

Additionally, it depends on your outlook. Some people see privacy as a must-have feature for crypto, but another group of people will say that transparancy is one of the killer features of crypto.

You got a 12.50% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!

You got a 27.59% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!

You got a 11.76% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!

You got a 13.16% upvote from @ubot courtesy of @stimialiti! Send 0.05 Steem or SBD to @ubot for an upvote with link of post in memo.

Every post gets Resteemed (follow us to get your post more exposure)!
98% of earnings paid daily to delegators! Go to www.ubot.ws for details.

Wow. That is AMAZING for IOTA! The biggest problem I had with IOTA going into the IoT market was its lack of smart contracts. I actually wrote 2 posts about it...

But now with Qubic, IOTA is my one of my favorite cryptocurrencies. I loved the DAG part of IOTA, but if it had smart contracts it would be much better.

Yes, I had this same 'issue' with IOTA too. I always liked the tech but had serious trouble seeing the token value proposition if it was only a currency. This increases it's value and usability a lot!

@steem881 you're on the @abusereports naughty list!
If you do not stop, your account will be rendered invisible on Steemit. Bad Steemian! Bad!

@steem881 you're on the @abusereports naughty list! Bad Steemian!

@steem881 you're on the @abusereports naughty list!
If you do not stop, your account will be rendered invisible on Steemit. Bad Steemian! Bad!

Wait, I'm confused... It seems to be a bot shilling a post, written by you.
In which you're reprimanding the bot?

I'm confused on how things work here..
HRRRMMMM!!!