Why should others have jurisdicion over a place. Individuals can make individual chioces about their lives, nor others. So my point is that an area where there are private property owners who enforce those contracts its just mafioso like. Not anarchistic at all. Which may be the case be those people cant use the label anarchy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Who are "others"? you just said that
This means that can own their own houses and land, right?
And then, according to Anarcho-Capitalist principle, they cannot dictate what anyone does outside of that.
You need to read more.