Apologies for the delayed response.
I believe you may have taken the article a bit too literally. The concept I was trying to convey is the SEC's arbitrary interference in the ICO/Crypto world is so badly thought out that it can be turned around and used against them by following the exact rules they are laying down.
Now that being said, I am totally committed to following through on the contract that is described for the coin. If you wish to buy $50,000 worth of SCT I will happily give you $100 every year. :)
Thank you for taking the time to read the post; I hope it was at least entertaining.
I noticed the entertaining/ironical tone and that's usually my taste of writting/reading, and don't worry I know that your SCT were an example to illustrate your point.
But my point is that you brought up a very interesting information about the badly conceived SEC's arbitraty interference, you might have discovered a kind of loophole and that's why I asked you all those questions, especially my last one about having a lawyer doing all the stuffs in your favor (notably stating that the remaining tokens you hold do count for "real money") so am I just "dreaming"?
Well, I spoke to a local attorney but they felt it would be a better idea to talk to a law firm that specializes in crypto. They liked the idea, though.
I'm gonna try to find some (I'm located in europe), so it might even different for me, but i can still be very interesting if I decide to settle & invest into the US, which is planned.
If you can provide any updates (if you decide to talk to the law firm for instance) that would be appreciated
If you aren't a US citizen then the whole accredited investor limitation doesn't apply to you. If you solicit US citizens to invest with you then you would need to worry about it, however.
yeah that's the plan actually, that's why i'm really interested, it could be less than 18 months so i'm definitely excited about it,so I will be able to apply later on