I'm not trying to censor, like I explained it's in the wrong section, it's provocative and it's just an attention seeking post. I'll gladly debate everyone like you can see from my previous comments in another topic a few days ago but just the entitled, self-righteous attitude you present doesn't make me want to debate, specially given that you're too stubborn to agree with evidences that go against your opinion and what you think
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
it's not in the wrong section at all!!! It's about veganism.
How do you know it's an attention-seeking post? And, BTW, don't we want our blogs to grab attention? You just don't like something so you try to throw a blanket over it.
Entitled, self-righteous attitude? Too stubborn? Evidences against my opinion? What are you talking about? I haven't said anything about... OMG. You do a lot of 'filling in the gaps' don't ya.
It is not a new discussion, there are lots of posts about veganism and proofs and all that already on Steemit under the vegan or veganism tab, the one you used so the only reason you did this is for your own advantage and ignore, belittle, ridicule or disagree no matter what proofs or arguments are presented that are different from yours so it's obviously not something worth wasting anyone's time just for your fun
What's so wrong with fun? It's a great way for people to share ideas, evidence, in a friendly way. It encourages the exploration of truth, whatever that is.
There aren't any proofs. If there were, I wouldn't have asked for it in the contest.
How is it to my advantage if your vegan position is the right one? If I am what you think I am, surely this would put that in the disadvantage. What are you so scared of?
Nothing wrong with that, just don't waste everyone's time just to achieve some low level of it for your own.
Perhaps benefit, not advantage, would be better suited. Either way it's just free "advertising" and rep for you for the sake of it with no point or valid discussion whatsoever. It wouldn't because of the followers with the same wrong ideas and need for trolling and being blind to evidence
Who decides which levels of fun are allowed in a decentralised system? You? It seems you think you can decide, planting flags and downvotes on people you just don't agree with. I'd feel ashamed of myself if I did something like that.
You keep saying it benefits or puts me at an advantage. Yes, the rep may move up a fraction of a percent but you'll see, if you look properly, I'm interested in the truth. I'm interested in discussion of these topics to burrow down to the truth. Why would I cling to an ideology if it were proven false?
Wrong ideas? By 'wrong' do you mean 'ideas shadowdragon doesn't agree with'? Who decides what's right and wrong? You again?
You ought to give your head a wobble.
I already explained more than once the reason for flagging, it's even in one of the four recommended points when you click the button, it's not because I don't agree with you, obviously. And a flag or downvote is just the opposite of a upvote, if it exists it is my right to use it if I do deem it fit when the post so entails.
No, it's not me who decided but, once again, the ideas are all out there, the proof/evidence as well, including on Steemit if you bother to look